2.5 sec in total
85 ms
1.7 sec
685 ms
Click here to check amazing Mg Web Partners content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mgwebpartners.com
We partner with brands to design and develop their ecommerce sites.
Visit mgwebpartners.comWe analyzed Mgwebpartners.com page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
mgwebpartners.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value4.4 s
75/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
85 ms
151 ms
173 ms
39 ms
176 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mgwebpartners.com, 88% (98 requests) were made to Sgwebpartners.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (534 ms) relates to the external source Sgwebpartners.com.
Page size can be reduced by 108.4 kB (5%)
2.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Mgwebpartners.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mg Web Partners images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mgwebpartners.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 84 (81%)
104
20
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mg Web Partners. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 73 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mgwebpartners.com
85 ms
sgwebpartners.com
151 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
173 ms
fancybox.css
39 ms
fonts.css
176 ms
jquery-ui.css
28 ms
multiselect.css
195 ms
scrollbar.css
30 ms
style.css
137 ms
shortcodes.css
40 ms
woocommerce.css
49 ms
resize.css
54 ms
woocommerce-resize.css
61 ms
ie11.css
195 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
73 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
81 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
97 ms
hooks.min.js
114 ms
w.js
39 ms
jquery.min.js
125 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
142 ms
core.min.js
376 ms
datepicker.min.js
148 ms
jgtb.js
159 ms
js
78 ms
wc-blocks.css
170 ms
front.min.js
289 ms
ta.js
178 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
177 ms
order-attribution.min.js
237 ms
react.min.js
299 ms
deprecated.min.js
303 ms
dom.min.js
289 ms
react-dom.min.js
237 ms
escape-html.min.js
238 ms
element.min.js
239 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
241 ms
i18n.min.js
251 ms
keycodes.min.js
269 ms
priority-queue.min.js
280 ms
compose.min.js
273 ms
private-apis.min.js
278 ms
redux-routine.min.js
494 ms
data.min.js
275 ms
lodash.min.js
481 ms
wc-blocks-registry.js
473 ms
url.min.js
436 ms
api-fetch.min.js
254 ms
wc-settings.js
258 ms
data-controls.min.js
255 ms
html-entities.min.js
385 ms
notices.min.js
405 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
357 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
358 ms
dom-ready.min.js
352 ms
a11y.min.js
370 ms
primitives.min.js
360 ms
warning.min.js
468 ms
blocks-components.js
360 ms
blocks-checkout.js
506 ms
order-attribution-blocks.min.js
351 ms
g.gif
25 ms
actual.js
436 ms
fancybox.js
294 ms
fitvids.js
316 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
314 ms
multiselect.js
314 ms
scroll.js
395 ms
scrollbar.js
313 ms
typer.js
420 ms
main.js
308 ms
mousewheel.js
350 ms
throttle-debounce.js
346 ms
touchswipe.js
345 ms
carousel.js
342 ms
jquery.json.min.js
420 ms
gravityforms.min.js
371 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
418 ms
utils.min.js
364 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
534 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
339 ms
mouse.min.js
334 ms
analytics.js
144 ms
sortable.min.js
310 ms
gsurvey.min.js
205 ms
hdr-home.png
415 ms
js
66 ms
circularstd-medium.woff
347 ms
circularstd-book.woff
389 ms
circularstd-bold.woff
388 ms
circularstd-black.woff
385 ms
ec.js
14 ms
collect
57 ms
bg-page-footer.jpg
493 ms
sgwp.ttf
389 ms
collect
75 ms
picturefill.min.js
216 ms
collect
53 ms
collect
7 ms
thumbnail-aunt-3.jpg
269 ms
thumb-customer-branchbasics-720x720.jpg
130 ms
thumb-customer-soberton-720x720.jpg
227 ms
thumbnail-oneshot-720x720.jpg
210 ms
thumb-customer-loup-ventures-720x720.jpg
357 ms
thumb-customer-boomboom-720x720.jpg
280 ms
thumb-customer-piff-720x720.jpg
411 ms
westrn-thumb-720x720.jpg
439 ms
img-google-stars.png
240 ms
collect
15 ms
js
52 ms
hdr-home.png.webp
254 ms
mgwebpartners.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mgwebpartners.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
mgwebpartners.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mgwebpartners.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mgwebpartners.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mgwebpartners.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mg Web Partners. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: