5.3 sec in total
555 ms
4.5 sec
209 ms
Welcome to micel.ru homepage info - get ready to check Micel best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about micel.ru
Электронные компоненты, радиодетали, расходные материалы для ремонта электроники, бытовой техники. Измерительные приборы, паяльное оборудование и инструмент. Товары для радиолюбителей, разработчиков э...
Visit micel.ruWe analyzed Micel.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 555 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
micel.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value7.4 s
28/100
10%
Value1,600 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.067
97/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
555 ms
677 ms
524 ms
402 ms
421 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Micel.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Micel.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 122.2 kB (7%)
1.8 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Micel.ru main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 99.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Micel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Micel.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (34%)
64
42
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Micel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
micel.ru
555 ms
micel.ru
677 ms
micel.ru
524 ms
style.min.css
402 ms
page_df18c6c99450d3e63cdcad48d730d85e_v1.css
421 ms
default_fc9ce32be6082985b72480c72884c05c_v1.css
422 ms
template_41ebc039fde8b2b975a35369591fb1cd_v1.css
935 ms
core.min.js
853 ms
kernel_main_v1.js
803 ms
dexie3.bundle.min.js
704 ms
core_ls.min.js
560 ms
core_frame_cache.min.js
653 ms
protobuf.min.js
842 ms
model.min.js
784 ms
rest.client.min.js
844 ms
pull.client.min.js
917 ms
jquery-1.12.4.min.js
1072 ms
ajax.min.js
987 ms
currency-core.bundle.min.js
987 ms
core_currency.min.js
993 ms
script.js
1047 ms
template_727245cd97a4b9945f8dd1a071c92397_v1.js
1359 ms
default_1f376607658838f3b3b9a35d24ff6315_v1.js
1123 ms
css
29 ms
ba.js
283 ms
logotip.png
263 ms
Micro.jpeg
140 ms
Pompa.jpeg
143 ms
ACC.jpeg
141 ms
ANT.jpeg
134 ms
BAT.jpg
141 ms
MULT.jpeg
267 ms
INST.jpeg
280 ms
BPI.jpeg
281 ms
Lamp.jpeg
282 ms
prov.jpg
283 ms
Modul.jpeg
392 ms
prochee.jpg
399 ms
Izol.jpeg
420 ms
sklad.jpg
420 ms
razrab.jpeg
422 ms
APOLLO.jpeg
424 ms
korpus.jpg
522 ms
KPT8.jpeg
531 ms
PBS12.jpeg
559 ms
SET.jpeg
559 ms
graf.jpg
561 ms
rem.jpg
565 ms
1f13d6bbca68cb2f9dfeb7dbfeb14a15.png
653 ms
7095177e4e2c87809d015b1823a42239.png
664 ms
a17bba377cc4d9e0b8bd3a4cafba8b5d.png
698 ms
0128f0de9ad81b97968b3014c6479b6e.png
699 ms
Zap3.jpg
703 ms
DIY.jpg
989 ms
avia_radiodetali_aviamir.png
1699 ms
vk.svg
796 ms
font
30 ms
icons_wish.svg
823 ms
%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8B%D0%B9-%D1%84%D0%BE%D0%BD.jpg
800 ms
%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8B%D0%B9-%D1%84%D0%BE%D0%BD.jpg
807 ms
%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8B%D0%B9-%D1%84%D0%BE%D0%BD.jpg
890 ms
map_large.png
1630 ms
tag.js
929 ms
arrows.png
851 ms
payment.svg
858 ms
advert.gif
813 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
164 ms
micel.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
micel.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
micel.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Micel.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Micel.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
micel.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Micel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: