7.3 sec in total
531 ms
5.1 sec
1.6 sec
Visit micropixel.co.in now to see the best up-to-date Micropixel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about micropixel.co.in
We are WordPress Development & design agency for web development & design. Also specialized in SEO & Paid Search to help businesses improve their online presence
Visit micropixel.co.inWe analyzed Micropixel.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 531 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
micropixel.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value14.0 s
1/100
10%
Value1,970 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.051
99/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
531 ms
1095 ms
222 ms
436 ms
631 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Micropixel.co.in, 11% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Micropixel.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 245.5 kB (23%)
1.1 MB
842.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Micropixel.co.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 519.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 245.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 245.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Micropixel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 302 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 255 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Micropixel.co.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (71%)
52
15
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Micropixel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
micropixel.co.in
531 ms
micropixel.co.in
1095 ms
style.min.css
222 ms
classic-themes.min.css
436 ms
eac-components.min.css
631 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
653 ms
autoptimize_single_62a6b61fcff9fd27e6b8d6596dc051ae.css
654 ms
autoptimize_single_28fb52d4827e181cf78db8933a9937c8.css
649 ms
autoptimize_single_b8fcf2835bc4f651a64f85d2718a74e0.css
683 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
722 ms
autoptimize_single_c4aede77dfe356d2b03dffb8c4bf547e.css
1050 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
1075 ms
swiper.min.css
893 ms
style.css
893 ms
css
38 ms
lqd-essentials.min.css
925 ms
jquery.min.js
1202 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1170 ms
js
68 ms
lottie.min.js
1556 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1229 ms
brands.min.css
1255 ms
lqd-essentials.min.css
1283 ms
autoptimize_single_7d4cdc18b95171f8dadb5d4fa0de7cf2.css
1448 ms
rbtools.min.js
1452 ms
rs6.min.js
1876 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1469 ms
eac-components.min.js
1497 ms
liquid-merged-scripts-10.js
2170 ms
theme.min.js
1982 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1715 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1928 ms
waypoints.min.js
1848 ms
core.min.js
1906 ms
frontend.min.js
2107 ms
eac-element-sticky.min.js
2092 ms
underscore.min.js
2103 ms
wp-util.min.js
2141 ms
frontend.min.js
2238 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
js
49 ms
collect
12 ms
dots1.svg
440 ms
quote1.svg
394 ms
micropixel-black-1.png
691 ms
modernagencyBG@2x1.jpg
1333 ms
modern-agency-banner1.webp
1095 ms
asset-11.svg
718 ms
Web-Design.png
771 ms
SEO.png
841 ms
web-development.png
936 ms
PPC.png
935 ms
eCommerce.png
998 ms
Partnership.png
1094 ms
GTWalsheimProRegular.woff2
1284 ms
GTWalsheimProBold.woff2
1128 ms
zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjWr7AIFscQ.ttf
75 ms
zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjQ76AIFscQ.ttf
117 ms
zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjSL9AIFscQ.ttf
132 ms
zYXgKVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKhdHeEA.ttf
133 ms
zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjXr8AIFscQ.ttf
133 ms
zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjR7_AIFscQ.ttf
159 ms
zYX-KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjbLuF6ZM.ttf
160 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1298 ms
GTWalsheimProBold.woff
250 ms
GTWalsheimProRegular.woff
428 ms
micropixel.co.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
micropixel.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
micropixel.co.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Micropixel.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Micropixel.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
micropixel.co.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Micropixel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: