24.7 sec in total
415 ms
22.8 sec
1.5 sec
Visit micropixel.co.in now to see the best up-to-date Micropixel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about micropixel.co.in
We are WordPress Development & design agency for web development & design. Also specialized in SEO & Paid Search to help businesses improve their online presence
Visit micropixel.co.inWe analyzed Micropixel.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 415 ms and then it took 24.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
micropixel.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.051
99/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
415 ms
991 ms
196 ms
389 ms
577 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Micropixel.co.in, 11% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Modernagency.liquid-themes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) relates to the external source Modernagency.liquid-themes.com.
Page size can be reduced by 226.1 kB (21%)
1.1 MB
839.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Micropixel.co.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 520.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 225.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 225.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Micropixel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 234 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 168 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Micropixel.co.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (75%)
48
12
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Micropixel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
micropixel.co.in
415 ms
micropixel.co.in
991 ms
eac-components.min.css
196 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
389 ms
autoptimize_single_d26ce366479c8e8b27c5724095bf0de1.css
577 ms
autoptimize_single_b20845239527ad33c6bfd06a73a6711a.css
579 ms
autoptimize_single_b8fcf2835bc4f651a64f85d2718a74e0.css
579 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
778 ms
autoptimize_single_90b38a25ad7e835ca6fc8f46a787f21c.css
584 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
600 ms
swiper.min.css
767 ms
eac-swiper.min.css
769 ms
image-gallery.min.css
771 ms
post-grid.min.css
780 ms
style.css
800 ms
css
34 ms
lqd-essentials.min.css
959 ms
jquery.min.js
1159 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
969 ms
lottie.min.js
1366 ms
js
70 ms
fontawesome.min.css
969 ms
brands.min.css
996 ms
lqd-essentials.min.css
1147 ms
autoptimize_single_7d4cdc18b95171f8dadb5d4fa0de7cf2.css
1171 ms
rbtools.min.js
1172 ms
rs6.min.js
1813 ms
eac-components.min.js
1339 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1351 ms
liquid-merged-scripts-10.js
1788 ms
theme.min.js
1611 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1548 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1549 ms
waypoints.min.js
1609 ms
core.min.js
1740 ms
frontend.min.js
1743 ms
eac-element-sticky.min.js
1792 ms
underscore.min.js
1796 ms
wp-util.min.js
2020 ms
frontend.min.js
2021 ms
dots1.svg
7554 ms
quote1.svg
19958 ms
micropixel-black-1.png
614 ms
modernagencyBG@2x1.jpg
798 ms
modern-agency-banner1.webp
767 ms
asset-11.svg
618 ms
Web-Design.png
793 ms
SEO.png
796 ms
web-development.png
796 ms
PPC.png
803 ms
eCommerce.png
962 ms
Partnership.png
985 ms
GTWalsheimProRegular.woff2
865 ms
GTWalsheimProBold.woff2
876 ms
zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjWr7AIFscg.woff
78 ms
zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjQ76AIFscg.woff
101 ms
zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjSL9AIFscg.woff
114 ms
zYXgKVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKhdHeEw.woff
114 ms
zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjXr8AIFscg.woff
115 ms
zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjR7_AIFscg.woff
115 ms
zYX-KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjbLuF6ZP.woff
113 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
812 ms
GTWalsheimProRegular.woff
193 ms
GTWalsheimProBold.woff
384 ms
micropixel.co.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
micropixel.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
micropixel.co.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Micropixel.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Micropixel.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
micropixel.co.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Micropixel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: