Tools & Wizards About Us
microscopereviewslab.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

microscopereviewslab.com

Start Here - Microscope Reviews Lab

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

73 ms

Resources Loaded

951 ms

Page Rendered

467 ms

microscopereviewslab.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Microscope Reviews Lab content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about microscopereviewslab.com

Welcome to Microscope Reviews Lab Your journey into the microscopic world starts here. 🚀 Shopping for a microscope online typically involves wading through thousands of reviews from different brands a...

Visit microscopereviewslab.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Microscopereviewslab.com page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

microscopereviewslab.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.109

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

microscopereviewslab.com

73 ms

microscopereviewslab.com

81 ms

js

72 ms

styles.css

50 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Microscopereviewslab.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (473 ms) belongs to the original domain Microscopereviewslab.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 179.1 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

987.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Microscopereviewslab.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 623.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 141.5 kB

  • Original 193.1 kB
  • After minification 188.4 kB
  • After compression 51.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 141.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 29.9 kB

  • Original 623.4 kB
  • After minification 593.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Microscope Reviews Lab images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 228.8 kB
  • After minification 228.8 kB
  • After compression 227.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 121.3 kB
  • After minification 121.3 kB
  • After compression 114.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Microscopereviewslab.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (87%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Microscope Reviews Lab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

microscopereviewslab.com

microscopereviewslab.com

73 ms

microscopereviewslab.com

microscopereviewslab.com

81 ms

js

js

72 ms

styles.css

styles.css

50 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

99 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

97 ms

screen.min.css

screen.min.css

141 ms

css

css

36 ms

style.css

style.css

133 ms

icons.css

icons.css

63 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

141 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

141 ms

tablepress-responsive.min.css

tablepress-responsive.min.css

142 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

166 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

160 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

164 ms

post-617.css

post-617.css

168 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

143 ms

post-1208.css

post-1208.css

167 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

178 ms

mailin-front.css

mailin-front.css

170 ms

css

css

44 ms

lazysizes.js

lazysizes.js

205 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

208 ms

devtools-detect.js

devtools-detect.js

246 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

225 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

180 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

234 ms

mailin-front.js

mailin-front.js

236 ms

counter.js

counter.js

37 ms

index.js

index.js

335 ms

index.js

index.js

473 ms

smooth_scroll.min.js

smooth_scroll.min.js

335 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

338 ms

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

338 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

336 ms

theme.js

theme.js

409 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

336 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

338 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

337 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

338 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

339 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

307 ms

breeze-lazy-load.min.js

breeze-lazy-load.min.js

341 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

308 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

274 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

277 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

314 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

315 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

312 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

301 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

314 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

308 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

340 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

339 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

339 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

348 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

350 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

342 ms

MSRL-Logo-V3.png

MSRL-Logo-V3.png

238 ms

svg+xml,%3Csvg%20viewBox%3D%270%200%201536%201024%27%20xmlns%3D%27http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%27%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E

svg+xml,%3Csvg%20viewBox%3D%270%200%201536%201024%27%20xmlns%3D%27http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%27%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E

265 ms

svg+xml,%3Csvg%20viewBox%3D%270%200%201024%201024%27%20xmlns%3D%27http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%27%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E

svg+xml,%3Csvg%20viewBox%3D%270%200%201024%201024%27%20xmlns%3D%27http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%27%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E

262 ms

how-do-scanning-electron-microscopes-work-370x305.png

how-do-scanning-electron-microscopes-work-370x305.png

305 ms

Things-Under-a-Microscope-370x305.png

Things-Under-a-Microscope-370x305.png

318 ms

How-to-Use-a-Microscope-370x305.png

How-to-Use-a-Microscope-370x305.png

323 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

20 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

41 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

61 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

71 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

71 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

70 ms

ts-icons.woff

ts-icons.woff

440 ms

t.php

t.php

95 ms

Homepage-Pix-1-1536x1024.jpg

Homepage-Pix-1-1536x1024.jpg

77 ms

Accessibility Review

microscopereviewslab.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

microscopereviewslab.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

microscopereviewslab.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Microscopereviewslab.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Microscopereviewslab.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

microscopereviewslab.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Microscope Reviews Lab. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: