Tools & Wizards About Us
microsearch.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

microsearch.net

MicroSearch Corporation

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

312 ms

Resources Loaded

971 ms

Page Rendered

482 ms

microsearch.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to microsearch.net homepage info - get ready to check Micro Search best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about microsearch.net

Visit microsearch.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Microsearch.net page load time and found that the first response time was 312 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

microsearch.net performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

58/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

microsearch.net

312 ms

style.min.css

52 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

50 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

60 ms

style.css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Microsearch.net, 15% (10 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to 0. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (320 ms) belongs to the original domain Microsearch.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 60.9 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Microsearch.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 978.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 50.6 kB

  • Original 63.1 kB
  • After minification 60.8 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 978.8 kB
  • After minification 978.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Micro Search images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 133.2 kB
  • After minification 133.2 kB
  • After compression 129.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 119.6 kB
  • After minification 119.6 kB
  • After compression 112.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Microsearch.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (85%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Micro Search. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

microsearch.net

microsearch.net

312 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

52 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

50 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

60 ms

style.css

style.css

40 ms

font-inter.css

font-inter.css

82 ms

twentytwenty.css

twentytwenty.css

58 ms

um-modal.min.css

um-modal.min.css

113 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

117 ms

tipsy.min.css

tipsy.min.css

120 ms

um-raty.min.css

um-raty.min.css

113 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

114 ms

um-fileupload.min.css

um-fileupload.min.css

119 ms

um-confirm.min.css

um-confirm.min.css

144 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

144 ms

default.date.min.css

default.date.min.css

146 ms

default.time.min.css

default.time.min.css

146 ms

fonticons-ii.min.css

fonticons-ii.min.css

147 ms

fonticons-fa.min.css

fonticons-fa.min.css

149 ms

um-fontawesome.min.css

um-fontawesome.min.css

211 ms

common.min.css

common.min.css

174 ms

um-responsive.min.css

um-responsive.min.css

175 ms

um-styles.min.css

um-styles.min.css

180 ms

cropper.min.css

cropper.min.css

181 ms

um-profile.min.css

um-profile.min.css

182 ms

um-account.min.css

um-account.min.css

206 ms

um-misc.min.css

um-misc.min.css

206 ms

um-old-default.min.css

um-old-default.min.css

224 ms

index.js

index.js

246 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

52 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

49 ms

um-gdpr.min.js

um-gdpr.min.js

246 ms

tracker.js

tracker.js

319 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

48 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

48 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

52 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

52 ms

tipsy.min.js

tipsy.min.js

317 ms

um-confirm.min.js

um-confirm.min.js

318 ms

picker.min.js

picker.min.js

318 ms

picker.date.min.js

picker.date.min.js

318 ms

picker.time.min.js

picker.time.min.js

318 ms

common.min.js

common.min.js

319 ms

cropper.min.js

cropper.min.js

319 ms

common-frontend.min.js

common-frontend.min.js

319 ms

um-modal.min.js

um-modal.min.js

320 ms

e-202429.js

e-202429.js

48 ms

jquery-form.min.js

jquery-form.min.js

319 ms

fileupload.js

fileupload.js

289 ms

um-functions.min.js

um-functions.min.js

253 ms

um-responsive.min.js

um-responsive.min.js

220 ms

um-conditional.min.js

um-conditional.min.js

220 ms

select2.full.min.js

select2.full.min.js

216 ms

en.js

en.js

216 ms

um-raty.min.js

um-raty.min.js

215 ms

um-scripts.min.js

um-scripts.min.js

240 ms

um-profile.min.js

um-profile.min.js

215 ms

um-account.min.js

um-account.min.js

216 ms

lukas-blazek-mcSDtbWXUZU-unsplash-2-1024x678.jpg

lukas-blazek-mcSDtbWXUZU-unsplash-2-1024x678.jpg

125 ms

taylor-vick-M5tzZtFCOfs-unsplash-1024x575.jpg

taylor-vick-M5tzZtFCOfs-unsplash-1024x575.jpg

157 ms

helloquence-5fNmWej4tAA-unsplash-1024x683.jpg

helloquence-5fNmWej4tAA-unsplash-1024x683.jpg

127 ms

jamie-street-7ip4yX5P6Q-unsplash-1024x768.jpg

jamie-street-7ip4yX5P6Q-unsplash-1024x768.jpg

190 ms

laterrian-mcintosh-KXTsofC_T0Q-unsplash-1024x731.jpg

laterrian-mcintosh-KXTsofC_T0Q-unsplash-1024x731.jpg

161 ms

katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash-1024x683.jpg

katie-moum-o0kbc907i20-unsplash-1024x683.jpg

128 ms

logo.png

logo.png

118 ms

kyle-ryan-HE95D88ZenE-unsplash-e1715566635115.jpg

kyle-ryan-HE95D88ZenE-unsplash-e1715566635115.jpg

172 ms

8AD3jaY2BkYGDgAWIxIGZiYARCESBmAfMYAAR6AEMAAAABAAAAANXtRbgAAAAA2AhRFAAAAADYCNuG

8AD3jaY2BkYGDgAWIxIGZiYARCESBmAfMYAAR6AEMAAAABAAAAANXtRbgAAAAA2AhRFAAAAADYCNuG

16 ms

print.css

print.css

35 ms

Accessibility Review

microsearch.net accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

microsearch.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

microsearch.net SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Microsearch.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Microsearch.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

microsearch.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Micro Search. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: