Tools & Wizards About Us
microsizer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

microsizer.com

Micro-Sizer Air Classifier | Progressive Industries, Inc.

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

143 ms

Resources Loaded

891 ms

Page Rendered

265 ms

microsizer.com screenshot

About Website

Visit microsizer.com now to see the best up-to-date Micro Sizer content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about microsizer.com

Micro-Sizer air classifier manufacturer and fine grind mill manufacturer. a leader in the area of fine and ultra-fine particle reduction and classifying

Visit microsizer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Microsizer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

microsizer.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.microsizer.com

143 ms

normalize.1.css

65 ms

styles.css

81 ms

scripts.js

56 ms

swfobject.js

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Microsizer.com, 14% (7 requests) were made to Widenetcp.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (253 ms) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.0 kB (11%)

Content Size

473.5 kB

After Optimization

421.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Microsizer.com main page is 473.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 280.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 29.4 kB
  • After minification 28.1 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 280.0 kB
  • After minification 278.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Micro Sizer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 771 B

  • Original 132.5 kB
  • After minification 132.5 kB
  • After compression 131.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 25.8 kB

  • Original 31.7 kB
  • After minification 20.3 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Microsizer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (42%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Micro Sizer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.microsizer.com

www.microsizer.com

143 ms

normalize.1.css

normalize.1.css

65 ms

styles.css

styles.css

81 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

56 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

59 ms

wjc4qex.js

wjc4qex.js

102 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

29 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

12 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

20 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

57 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

57 ms

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

84 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

86 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

84 ms

override.css

override.css

85 ms

element.js

element.js

44 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

90 ms

jquery.cycle2.min.js

jquery.cycle2.min.js

90 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

86 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

89 ms

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js

61 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

127 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

127 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

253 ms

mainBg.png

mainBg.png

253 ms

containerBg.png

containerBg.png

38 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

78 ms

largespinningglobe.gif

largespinningglobe.gif

203 ms

whitepaper.gif

whitepaper.gif

47 ms

logolinkedinicon.gif

logolinkedinicon.gif

77 ms

twitter.gif

twitter.gif

77 ms

welcomeBg.png

welcomeBg.png

76 ms

Products_Image_1388448729.gif

Products_Image_1388448729.gif

119 ms

productsViewMoreButton.png

productsViewMoreButton.png

117 ms

Products_Image_1388081014.jpg

Products_Image_1388081014.jpg

117 ms

Products_Image_1421440727.jpg

Products_Image_1421440727.jpg

151 ms

Products_Image_1388080846.jpg

Products_Image_1388080846.jpg

139 ms

Products_Image_1388091949.jpg

Products_Image_1388091949.jpg

201 ms

Products_Image_1388159226.gif

Products_Image_1388159226.gif

159 ms

Products_Image_1391272956.gif

Products_Image_1391272956.gif

148 ms

scrollerArrows.png

scrollerArrows.png

166 ms

d

d

45 ms

d

d

101 ms

d

d

123 ms

d

d

199 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

8 ms

collect

collect

61 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

p.gif

p.gif

28 ms

js

js

80 ms

Accessibility Review

microsizer.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

microsizer.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

microsizer.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Microsizer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Microsizer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

microsizer.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Micro Sizer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: