5.9 sec in total
377 ms
5 sec
546 ms
Welcome to microtom.net homepage info - get ready to check Microtom best content right away, or after learning these important things about microtom.net
Empower your business with microtom®. Agile software development, managed services, and expertise for success in the digital landscape.
Visit microtom.netWe analyzed Microtom.net page load time and found that the first response time was 377 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
microtom.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value15.5 s
0/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value7.8 s
44/100
10%
377 ms
197 ms
868 ms
31 ms
133 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Microtom.net, 89% (25 requests) were made to Microtom.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Cdn-cookieyes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (868 ms) relates to the external source Microtom.com.
Page size can be reduced by 74.8 kB (13%)
569.1 kB
494.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Microtom.net main page is 569.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 345.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.2 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Microtom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 68 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 208 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Microtom.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (17%)
24
20
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Microtom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
microtom.net
377 ms
www.microtom.com
197 ms
microtom.com
868 ms
script.js
31 ms
style.min.css
133 ms
theme.1.css
294 ms
theme.update.css
289 ms
analytics.min.js
289 ms
uikit.min.js
485 ms
uikit-icons-circle.min.js
396 ms
theme.js
289 ms
log
398 ms
logo-inverse-slogan.svg
105 ms
logo.svg
101 ms
logo-color.svg
103 ms
DSC03949-scaled-5b5f4664.jpeg
246 ms
microtom-team-03e8e31a.jpeg
115 ms
microtom-team-42cc1b8c.jpeg
206 ms
2560-web_0031_KUN03353-Bearbeitet.jpg-c10f55c1.jpeg
333 ms
2560-web_0012_KUN04057.jpg-65d85c3d.jpeg
261 ms
DSC05500-Bearbeitet-2-scaled-57603333.jpeg
233 ms
2560-web_0036_KUN03659-Bearbeitet.jpg-2f0cfabd.jpeg
249 ms
2560-web_0002_KUN05018-Bearbeitet.jpg-464e817e.jpeg
338 ms
2560-web_0005_KUN05562.jpg-48a3bd89.jpeg
383 ms
signature-workflows-7d1b2d75.jpeg
399 ms
ralph-ravi-kayden-0TgovzL3CBw-unsplash-scaled-ca09095c.jpeg
370 ms
low-volume-packaging-1-scaled-ac1e2385.jpeg
399 ms
microsoft_partner.svg
433 ms
microtom.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
microtom.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
microtom.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Microtom.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Microtom.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
microtom.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Microtom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: