Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

microweber.net

Microweber Website

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

241 ms

Resources Loaded

756 ms

Page Rendered

71 ms

microweber.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Microweber content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about microweber.net

Visit microweber.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Microweber.net page load time and found that the first response time was 241 ms and then it took 827 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

microweber.net performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

79/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

microweber.net

241 ms

bootstrap.min.css

495 ms

cover.css

207 ms

adsbygoogle.js

110 ms

show_ads_impl.js

219 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Microweber.net, 29% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 29% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (495 ms) belongs to the original domain Microweber.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 469.8 kB (64%)

Content Size

739.0 kB

After Optimization

269.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Microweber.net main page is 739.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 576.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 6.3 kB
  • After minification 6.0 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 56% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 332.8 kB

  • Original 576.0 kB
  • After minification 576.0 kB
  • After compression 243.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 332.8 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 133.5 kB

  • Original 156.7 kB
  • After minification 156.4 kB
  • After compression 23.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Microweber.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 133.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Microweber. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

microweber.net accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

microweber.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

microweber.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Microweber.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Microweber.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Microweber. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: