Tools & Wizards About Us
midlap.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

midlap.com

Midlap – Project Management and Team Communication Tool

Page Load Speed

8 sec in total

First Response

684 ms

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

908 ms

midlap.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to midlap.com homepage info - get ready to check Midlap best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about midlap.com

Work anywhere, anytime with Midlap. Midlap puts everything you need to get work done in one place. Control team and organization work to focus on their goals, projects, and tasks.

Visit midlap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Midlap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 684 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

midlap.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.8 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value960 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.04

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

midlap.com

684 ms

js

128 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

78 ms

style.min.css

132 ms

css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Midlap.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) belongs to the original domain Midlap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 167.5 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Midlap.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 113.2 kB

  • Original 133.7 kB
  • After minification 129.0 kB
  • After compression 20.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 30.8 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Midlap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 455 B

  • Original 227.5 kB
  • After minification 227.5 kB
  • After compression 227.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 23.0 kB

  • Original 150.5 kB
  • After minification 149.1 kB
  • After compression 127.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Midlap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.0 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (58%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Midlap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

midlap.com

midlap.com

684 ms

js

js

128 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

78 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

132 ms

css

css

48 ms

menu-animation.min.css

menu-animation.min.css

75 ms

bdt-uikit.css

bdt-uikit.css

125 ms

element-pack-site.css

element-pack-site.css

94 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

90 ms

bbp-voting.css

bbp-voting.css

151 ms

bbpress.min.css

bbpress.min.css

151 ms

slick.css

slick.css

205 ms

slick-slider-style.css

slick-slider-style.css

1213 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

1214 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

2217 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

2235 ms

animate.css

animate.css

2246 ms

sliders.css

sliders.css

2218 ms

icomoon.css

icomoon.css

3223 ms

lae-frontend.css

lae-frontend.css

3237 ms

lae-widgets.css

lae-widgets.css

3226 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

3248 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

3229 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

3242 ms

global.css

global.css

3280 ms

post-2407.css

post-2407.css

4237 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

3319 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

4257 ms

bbp-voting.js

bbp-voting.js

4256 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

4257 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

3281 ms

style.min.js

style.min.js

4295 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

3350 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

4295 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

4344 ms

wpsisac-public.js

wpsisac-public.js

4342 ms

bdt-uikit.min.js

bdt-uikit.min.js

4346 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

4343 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

4345 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

4277 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

4337 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

4322 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

4359 ms

element-pack-site.min.js

element-pack-site.min.js

4281 ms

js

js

74 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

22 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

4586 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

4998 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

banner-bg.svg

banner-bg.svg

808 ms

board-bg.svg

board-bg.svg

847 ms

board-1.png

board-1.png

815 ms

board2-3.png

board2-3.png

1309 ms

board3-2.png

board3-2.png

1308 ms

board4-1.png

board4-1.png

1312 ms

assemble-bg.svg

assemble-bg.svg

1300 ms

assemble-11-1.png

assemble-11-1.png

1315 ms

share1-4.png

share1-4.png

1311 ms

checklist-5.png

checklist-5.png

1310 ms

ideas-2-1.jpg

ideas-2-1.jpg

1316 ms

3.png

3.png

1318 ms

2.png

2.png

1313 ms

1.png

1.png

1317 ms

Untitled-1.png

Untitled-1.png

1317 ms

events-2.png

events-2.png

1319 ms

events3.png

events3.png

1320 ms

makeing-content3.png

makeing-content3.png

1320 ms

makeing-content.png

makeing-content.png

1322 ms

makeing-content2.png

makeing-content2.png

1320 ms

just-Chat-1.png

just-Chat-1.png

1323 ms

just-Chat-2-1.png

just-Chat-2-1.png

1320 ms

just-Chat%E2%80%8B3-4.png

just-Chat%E2%80%8B3-4.png

1324 ms

Real-time-3.jpg

Real-time-3.jpg

1277 ms

set-of-images-2.jpg

set-of-images-2.jpg

1314 ms

Real-time-4.jpg

Real-time-4.jpg

1273 ms

Organizational-tools-300x155.jpg

Organizational-tools-300x155.jpg

1272 ms

Team-management-software-300x155.jpg

Team-management-software-300x155.jpg

1273 ms

Project-management-software-with-chat-300x155.jpg

Project-management-software-with-chat-300x155.jpg

1273 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

118 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

150 ms

frontend-msie.min.css

frontend-msie.min.css

352 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

117 ms

Accessibility Review

midlap.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

midlap.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

midlap.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Midlap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Midlap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

midlap.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Midlap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: