3.8 sec in total
222 ms
2.7 sec
818 ms
Visit midrasim.com now to see the best up-to-date Midrasim content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about midrasim.com
באתר מדרסים ריכזנו עבורכם מידע חשוב ומועיל בכל הקשור בבעיות כף הרגל וכמו כן דרכים לטיפול ומניעה לבעיות אלו.
Visit midrasim.comWe analyzed Midrasim.com page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
midrasim.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value3.4 s
65/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value1,140 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
222 ms
557 ms
295 ms
42 ms
291 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Midrasim.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Midrasim.com.
Page size can be reduced by 265.8 kB (18%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Midrasim.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 912.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 254.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 254.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Midrasim images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Midrasim.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (65%)
68
24
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Midrasim. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
midrasim.com
222 ms
midrasim.com
557 ms
styles.css
295 ms
styles-rtl.css
42 ms
shop-frontend.css
291 ms
slick.css
290 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
304 ms
wishlist.css
54 ms
default-rtl.css
344 ms
style.min.css
488 ms
flatsome-rtl.css
681 ms
flatsome-shop-rtl.css
581 ms
style.css
576 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.css
579 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
355 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
367 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
381 ms
hooks.min.js
393 ms
w.js
20 ms
jquery.min.js
412 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
422 ms
slick.js
436 ms
shop-frontend.js
457 ms
jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js
738 ms
js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js
763 ms
public.js
940 ms
js
73 ms
7.css
497 ms
js
43 ms
email-decode.min.js
394 ms
index.js
657 ms
index.js
666 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1001 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
551 ms
js.cookie.min.js
562 ms
woocommerce.min.js
571 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
1000 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
580 ms
flatsome.js
591 ms
wishlist.js
601 ms
flatsome-live-search.js
610 ms
app.min.js
622 ms
woocommerce.js
632 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
556 ms
cf77_validation.js
564 ms
packery.pkgd.min.js
573 ms
g.gif
22 ms
gtm.js
293 ms
fbevents.js
293 ms
4e765036-1639-11e6-9201-67e728e86f39.jpg
298 ms
logo_01.png
450 ms
logo_02.png
286 ms
blog_005.jpg
621 ms
hp_img-1-768x214-1.png
535 ms
hp_banners_001.jpg
651 ms
hp_banners_002.jpg
805 ms
hp_banners_003.jpg
288 ms
banner_bg2.jpg
289 ms
003-foot.png
289 ms
001-footsteps.png
351 ms
002-leg.png
352 ms
004-heart.png
353 ms
%D7%A7%D7%A9%D7%AA-%D7%A8%D7%92%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%94-1.png
353 ms
S2000__43392_zoom-300x300.jpg
354 ms
%D7%A7%D7%A9%D7%AA-%D7%92%D7%91%D7%95%D7%94%D7%94-150x150-2-150x150.png
375 ms
Albert-2-Pro-300x300-1-150x150.png
374 ms
close-cross.png
402 ms
001-phone.png
403 ms
pop_002-226x300.png
403 ms
pop_01.png
412 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtuZnIGaV2YOrrM9JDA.woff
612 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtuZnIGiV2YOrrM9JDClg.woff
561 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtuZnIGSV2YOrrM9JDClg.woff
659 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtgFgIGaV2YOrrM9JDA.woff
864 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtgFgIGiV2YOrrM9JDClg.woff
764 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtgFgIGSV2YOrrM9JDClg.woff
833 ms
fl-icons.ttf
907 ms
midrasim.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
midrasim.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
midrasim.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
IW
HE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Midrasim.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Hebrew is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Midrasim.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
midrasim.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Midrasim. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: