7 sec in total
525 ms
5.7 sec
783 ms
Visit mift.net now to see the best up-to-date Mift content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mift.net
北欧フィンランドのプロがお届けする、通な雑貨屋さん
Visit mift.netWe analyzed Mift.net page load time and found that the first response time was 525 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
mift.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value21.3 s
0/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value1,500 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.166
71/100
15%
Value21.8 s
1/100
10%
525 ms
1926 ms
68 ms
200 ms
376 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Mift.net, 22% (21 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Mift.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (20%)
5.2 MB
4.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Mift.net main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 956.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mift needs image optimization as it can save up to 956.1 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mift.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (79%)
87
18
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mift.net
525 ms
mift.net
1926 ms
js
68 ms
vkExUnit_style.css
200 ms
style.min.css
376 ms
style.css
550 ms
style.css
670 ms
style.css
695 ms
style.css
699 ms
style.css
712 ms
style.css
724 ms
style.css
719 ms
style.css
843 ms
style.css
876 ms
style.css
877 ms
style.css
893 ms
style.css
898 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
913 ms
style.css
1014 ms
style.css
1054 ms
style.css
1058 ms
style.css
1078 ms
biz-cal.css
1068 ms
styles.css
1100 ms
style.css
1186 ms
dashicons.min.css
1405 ms
xo-event-calendar.css
1241 ms
style-index.css
1238 ms
style.css
1438 ms
style.css
1283 ms
blog-card.css
1357 ms
block-build.css
1415 ms
style.css
1419 ms
all.min.css
1649 ms
jquery.min.js
1706 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1587 ms
calendar.js
1585 ms
ajax.js
1595 ms
css2
31 ms
css2
119 ms
api.js
37 ms
vk-faq2.min.js
1621 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1653 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1473 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1405 ms
index.js
1182 ms
smooth-scroll.min.js
1156 ms
all.min.js
1201 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
1528 ms
vk-slider.min.js
1316 ms
main.js
1308 ms
index.js
1187 ms
page.php
421 ms
christmas-gd26359a88_1280.jpg
646 ms
headlogo.png
454 ms
top1.png
1244 ms
h.workshop.jpg
781 ms
haukilahti_puisto-1.png
1516 ms
cafe-edited-1024x575.png
1349 ms
20230810offer.jpg
923 ms
ompele_top-1024x576.jpg
992 ms
summer1-1024x768.jpg
973 ms
hotel.png
1229 ms
forest.png
1096 ms
santaclaus.png
961 ms
0nksC9PgP_wGh21A2KeqGiTq.ttf
66 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
1195 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
1085 ms
wARDj0u
4 ms
PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA
4 ms
r8xWWK5RS5M.css
21 ms
vGTeM7AQu12.css
24 ms
BZdxwZYnZtY.css
29 ms
Aq3fWRqzWdY.js
34 ms
vxmlpLbAeCj.js
28 ms
o1ndYS2og_B.js
26 ms
_02W6YRik00.js
27 ms
p55HfXW__mM.js
27 ms
k_PjgALRjoR.js
31 ms
qJoe20iyDr0.js
32 ms
CwUW1mXVRXb.js
68 ms
CGo9cU7zbWd.js
90 ms
EcPi7SsydEO.js
66 ms
_iENDDwY6Fe.js
100 ms
ps0npFgHj8z.js
99 ms
kww4kc8mdjt.js
109 ms
HzxD9aAXSyD.js
108 ms
Q-X-GXL_I_5.js
112 ms
recaptcha__en.js
117 ms
247657461_5014792941884132_8059429330786328900_n.jpg
143 ms
OcmMPieTVMv.js
12 ms
CK719qJHOVF.js
15 ms
360082335_764402945685597_1240368211807172311_n.jpg
177 ms
UXtr_j2Fwe-.png
12 ms
mift.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
mift.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
mift.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mift.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mift.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mift.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mift. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: