Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

mikroe.com

Time-saving embedded tools - MIKROE

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

741 ms

mikroe.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mikroe.com homepage info - get ready to check MIKROE best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about mikroe.com

Buy among 2000+ MikroElektronika original products: Compilers, Development boards, Add-on Boards, Programmers Debuggers and more

Visit mikroe.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mikroe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mikroe.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value26.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value28,720 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value38.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mikroe.com

134 ms

www.mikroe.com

517 ms

bootstrap_stripped.css

88 ms

defaults.css

125 ms

simplicity.css

132 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Mikroe.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Cdn.mikroe.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (517 ms) belongs to the original domain Mikroe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 205.4 kB (24%)

Content Size

866.8 kB

After Optimization

661.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Mikroe.com main page is 866.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 580.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 77.6 kB

  • Original 90.0 kB
  • After minification 75.6 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 580.1 kB
  • After minification 577.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MIKROE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 36 B

  • Original 37.5 kB
  • After minification 37.5 kB
  • After compression 37.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 125.0 kB

  • Original 159.2 kB
  • After minification 132.2 kB
  • After compression 34.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mikroe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 125.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (60%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MIKROE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mikroe.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mikroe.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mikroe.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mikroe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mikroe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of MIKROE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: