Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

mikrofilter.de

Tankreinigung, Grotamar 82 uvm. von Mikrofiltertechnik aus Geesthacht

Page Load Speed

11.5 sec in total

First Response

578 ms

Resources Loaded

10.4 sec

Page Rendered

592 ms

mikrofilter.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mikrofilter.de homepage info - get ready to check Mikrofilter best content right away, or after learning these important things about mikrofilter.de

Wir sind Ihr kompetenter Partner für Tankreinigung, Dieseladditiven wie Grotamar 82, Tankinspektion und Kraftstoffanalysen.

Visit mikrofilter.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Mikrofilter.de page load time and found that the first response time was 578 ms and then it took 10.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mikrofilter.de performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value34.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value25,240 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value37.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mikrofilter.de

578 ms

www.mikrofiltertechnik.de

2104 ms

css

34 ms

js

44 ms

styles.css

3341 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mikrofilter.de, 49% (44 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 22% (20 requests) were made to Mikrofiltertechnik.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Mikrofiltertechnik.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 567.5 kB (34%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Mikrofilter.de main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 900.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 84.0 kB

  • Original 94.6 kB
  • After minification 89.8 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.0 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 900.4 kB
  • After minification 875.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mikrofilter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 419.6 kB

  • Original 626.7 kB
  • After minification 617.6 kB
  • After compression 207.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 419.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 39.2 kB

  • Original 48.0 kB
  • After minification 47.4 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mikrofilter.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (26%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

57

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mikrofilter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mikrofilter.de accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

mikrofilter.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

mikrofilter.de SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mikrofilter.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mikrofilter.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mikrofilter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: