Tools & Wizards About Us
mikrowelletest.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

mikrowelletest.org

MikrowelleTest.org - aktuelle Testsieger von 2011 / 2012, Berichte und Vergleich

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

317 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

119 ms

mikrowelletest.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mikrowelletest.org homepage info - get ready to check Mikrowelle Test best content right away, or after learning these important things about mikrowelletest.org

Mikrowelle-Test.org zeigt die besten Mikrowellen aus den aktuellen Test-Berichtergebnissen 2012. Hier werden die Stärken und Schwächen der Mikrowelle Testsieger eingehend aufgezeigt.

Visit mikrowelletest.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Mikrowelletest.org page load time and found that the first response time was 317 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mikrowelletest.org performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mikrowelletest.org

317 ms

www.mikrowelletest.org

544 ms

mootools.js

131 ms

caption.js

190 ms

system.css

191 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Mikrowelletest.org, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Google.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (544 ms) belongs to the original domain Mikrowelletest.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.4 kB (24%)

Content Size

220.7 kB

After Optimization

168.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mikrowelletest.org main page is 220.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 98.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 14.7 kB

  • Original 19.9 kB
  • After minification 19.1 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 931 B

  • Original 98.2 kB
  • After minification 97.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mikrowelle Test images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 31.8 kB

  • Original 80.5 kB
  • After minification 80.5 kB
  • After compression 48.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.8 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 22.0 kB
  • After minification 22.0 kB
  • After compression 17.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mikrowelletest.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.0 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (75%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mikrowelle Test. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mikrowelletest.org

mikrowelletest.org

317 ms

www.mikrowelletest.org

www.mikrowelletest.org

544 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

131 ms

caption.js

caption.js

190 ms

system.css

system.css

191 ms

general.css

general.css

192 ms

addons.css

addons.css

192 ms

layout.css

layout.css

193 ms

template.css

template.css

240 ms

typo.css

typo.css

285 ms

ja.script.js

ja.script.js

287 ms

ja.ddmod.js

ja.ddmod.js

289 ms

css.css

css.css

288 ms

css.js

css.js

292 ms

white.css

white.css

343 ms

brand

brand

8 ms

brandjs.js

brandjs.js

17 ms

icon-min.gif

icon-min.gif

119 ms

icon-max.gif

icon-max.gif

120 ms

ga.js

ga.js

35 ms

header-subpage-bg.gif

header-subpage-bg.gif

96 ms

mikrowelle-test.png

mikrowelle-test.png

194 ms

mainnav-bg.gif

mainnav-bg.gif

95 ms

mikrowelle-testsieger.jpg

mikrowelle-testsieger.jpg

192 ms

button-produkt.jpg

button-produkt.jpg

121 ms

mikrowelle-test.jpg

mikrowelle-test.jpg

217 ms

mikrowelle-test-2010-2011.jpg

mikrowelle-test-2010-2011.jpg

239 ms

branding.png

branding.png

35 ms

mainnav-sep.gif

mainnav-sep.gif

173 ms

mainnav-active.gif

mainnav-active.gif

236 ms

mainnav-grad.gif

mainnav-grad.gif

268 ms

line-sep.gif

line-sep.gif

270 ms

bullet3.gif

bullet3.gif

273 ms

bullet7.gif

bullet7.gif

296 ms

icon-marke.gif

icon-marke.gif

316 ms

icon-news.gif

icon-news.gif

329 ms

hline.gif

hline.gif

362 ms

arrow2.png

arrow2.png

364 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

Accessibility Review

mikrowelletest.org accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mikrowelletest.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

mikrowelletest.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mikrowelletest.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mikrowelletest.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mikrowelletest.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mikrowelle Test. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: