1.3 sec in total
75 ms
768 ms
475 ms
Visit mile.cloud now to see the best up-to-date Mile content for Taiwan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mile.cloud
CloudMile is a leading AI and cloud service company that empowers enterprises by utilizing machine learning, big data, and Google Cloud services.
Visit mile.cloudWe analyzed Mile.cloud page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
mile.cloud performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value13.5 s
0/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value2,420 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
75 ms
471 ms
65 ms
41 ms
281 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Mile.cloud, 13% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (471 ms) belongs to the original domain Mile.cloud.
Page size can be reduced by 154.7 kB (82%)
188.9 kB
34.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Mile.cloud main page is 188.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 187.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 154.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 154.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mile images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (84%)
31
5
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
mile.cloud
75 ms
mile.cloud
471 ms
gtm.js
65 ms
dc3ab5f7f1052d7c3223.css
41 ms
cloudmile-mobile.svg
281 ms
css2
42 ms
email-decode.min.js
21 ms
questions.png
229 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
33 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
45 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
65 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
65 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
66 ms
polyfills-c75c9558d19ab3989f9c.js
27 ms
main-d9c24a3bcdf4bf35b64d.js
41 ms
webpack-e067438c4cf4ef2ef178.js
42 ms
framework.9707fddd9ae5927c17c3.js
65 ms
commons.a48a18764d10af663aeb.js
62 ms
e2543123f3df41ee395169384e643d9b8ad8a643.b47bc3f90cad41eaa383.js
64 ms
a9c157bccc89392faae6df62ace83ada7706dae0.3606fd2967e8e37f43ff.js
65 ms
_app-8182ce4d65e3133f8a42.js
99 ms
cb1608f2.ba4c3f4bbd0da87cb839.js
98 ms
a9a7754c.4acbad5b371ff453ace3.js
99 ms
29107295.f64f1de5d32d4a2a1c23.js
99 ms
a4c92b5b.dc113c51490248c3a586.js
100 ms
3eb5915ebd626e3e8056142a65ef9aa7dc62ae38.ad6c1a8b373d03f9b983.js
99 ms
3d52431238a030f88b5fc537dc721d15a3a8ca7a.958b846aa7334eeee2b1.js
98 ms
2a3d87545b8b08990e53697674cfc6cc5dab7d17.1ac7d7ec4c40d2bd8d69.js
100 ms
b9f4d8e947cf40e556dce6bcf9d475a8caabb7d7.3674f6bd4151b03f0ba8.js
147 ms
42c1285855b2a663afbf1aa44acea05da6f3aa4e.0edbfe3738eeb7b0432c.js
146 ms
fba34f019baaf804ad8755dfacfdaf85ba16aaea.d606ebe256cf9f5b1d56.js
147 ms
a6c2da072673c55a6ca2174df4f4d948f576c4a0.2b5dfe270635ce7cd66d.js
147 ms
25ff6cc6417da5f4ee0590eac6d657e60658968f.ab1e5024a6e1a6f3fe43.js
148 ms
883ccf121e34d2a40daa36e59604a719311579b8.1e70d0dc71053518d6ce.js
147 ms
index-931d5d8ef81bc3e86409.js
148 ms
_buildManifest.js
150 ms
_ssgManifest.js
151 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
147 ms
mile.cloud accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mile.cloud best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
mile.cloud SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mile.cloud can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mile.cloud main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mile.cloud
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mile. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: