2.3 sec in total
300 ms
1.3 sec
676 ms
Visit mile.cloud now to see the best up-to-date Mile content for Taiwan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mile.cloud
CloudMile is a leading AI and cloud service company that empowers enterprises by utilizing machine learning, big data, and Google Cloud services.
Visit mile.cloudWe analyzed Mile.cloud page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
mile.cloud performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value13.3 s
0/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value1,880 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.272
45/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
300 ms
77 ms
265 ms
250 ms
21 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Mile.cloud, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (902 ms) belongs to the original domain Mile.cloud.
Page size can be reduced by 113.0 kB (61%)
183.9 kB
70.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Mile.cloud main page is 183.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 138.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 112.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mile images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 396 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (85%)
48
7
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
mile.cloud
300 ms
gtm.js
77 ms
430100688e0e65d63fdc.css
265 ms
cloudmile-mobile.svg
250 ms
email-decode.min.js
21 ms
questions.png
246 ms
polyfills-7ec82c1724586b5d8cb5.js
386 ms
main-2c152456cc4d4dee6fd3.js
29 ms
webpack-e067438c4cf4ef2ef178.js
31 ms
framework.9707fddd9ae5927c17c3.js
58 ms
commons.a48a18764d10af663aeb.js
41 ms
1f0b81b3c0ebc45332c3016e49cf4f69f0f6241c.3aeb625679c35a34b81f.js
57 ms
a9c157bccc89392faae6df62ace83ada7706dae0.c1b73995d7d3e9cbd8f6.js
97 ms
_app-cf5c90b6628abc828c7d.js
96 ms
cb1608f2.ba4c3f4bbd0da87cb839.js
97 ms
a9a7754c.4acbad5b371ff453ace3.js
97 ms
29107295.4b96a9d2a0e4a5b2f1b6.js
98 ms
a4c92b5b.5f0e377efa86875e21ef.js
132 ms
3955b40eb2fba5a0c095433d0c75ebfc99600911.7013788d11be135143a5.js
902 ms
c1d9f6ee71ffe8466e438ef104d4ea93e44f8e97.958b846aa7334eeee2b1.js
132 ms
6ee0c09cd2a2bfea2ab07c9ea2ec787915284d07.1305e3d51c9bf00e00c8.js
132 ms
9be682e92466fcef660491b47fd3caca1096e1b2.51d00d23491db1f2b248.js
144 ms
0acf5f5f404076bda00d330b118a1bf331ccf0ab.266b550b728100b095ec.js
166 ms
3209e439b87722b9253a829f8a5ab06d6fba8d45.e6e3caf15a6ec3190fa2.js
238 ms
64ff00457965dc9620e4fcfc77dc34891cc1c019.a517dc3355924a96da98.js
246 ms
a3549c0557da603180f3161347043939cb9dd067.1d168ce52fbc5bda068c.js
245 ms
index-426aecb7f0be3e3fd876.js
247 ms
_buildManifest.js
248 ms
_ssgManifest.js
250 ms
v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194
59 ms
conversion_async.js
126 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
fbevents.js
111 ms
js
111 ms
collect
142 ms
css2
151 ms
2180523948742804
382 ms
370 ms
415 ms
434 ms
475 ms
collect
332 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
256 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
286 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
322 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
320 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
311 ms
384405522456494
156 ms
79 ms
ga-audiences
110 ms
111 ms
87 ms
40 ms
445757380614144
63 ms
mile.cloud accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mile.cloud best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
mile.cloud SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mile.cloud can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mile.cloud main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mile.cloud
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mile. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: