Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 38

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

miles33.com

A leading supplier of digital publishing solutions for the media industry.

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

536 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

429 ms

miles33.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to miles33.com homepage info - get ready to check Miles 33 best content for Italy right away, or after learning these important things about miles33.com

Miles 33 is a leading supplier of digital publishing solutions for the media industry

Visit miles33.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Miles33.com page load time and found that the first response time was 536 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

miles33.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.7 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.153

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

miles33.com

536 ms

jquery.min.js

47 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

155 ms

dotdotdot.js

158 ms

jquery.bxSlider.min.js

159 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Miles33.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (568 ms) belongs to the original domain Miles33.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 625.4 kB (63%)

Content Size

990.0 kB

After Optimization

364.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Miles33.com main page is 990.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 807.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 137.4 kB

  • Original 182.3 kB
  • After minification 177.6 kB
  • After compression 44.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 488.0 kB

  • Original 807.7 kB
  • After minification 807.7 kB
  • After compression 319.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 488.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (61%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Miles 33. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

miles33.com accessibility score

38

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

miles33.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

miles33.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Miles33.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Miles33.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Miles 33. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: