Tools & Wizards About Us
millefila.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

millefila.de

Millefila | Blog über Stricken, Nähen, Patchwork/Quilting und Perlenhäkeln

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

97 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

603 ms

millefila.de screenshot

About Website

Visit millefila.de now to see the best up-to-date Millefila content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about millefila.de

Bei Millefila geht es um Stricken, Perlenhäkeln, Nähen, DIY und Mosaik. Du findest hier Inspirationen, Anleitungen und einiges mehr.

Visit millefila.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Millefila.de page load time and found that the first response time was 97 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

millefila.de performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

68/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

millefila.de

97 ms

www.millefila.de

222 ms

style.css

181 ms

widget.css

194 ms

colorbox.css

208 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Millefila.de, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (572 ms) belongs to the original domain Millefila.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Millefila.de main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 928.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 39.9 kB

  • Original 52.0 kB
  • After minification 49.2 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 928.9 kB
  • After minification 927.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Millefila images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 72 B

  • Original 24.4 kB
  • After minification 24.4 kB
  • After compression 24.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 72.6 kB
  • After minification 71.5 kB
  • After compression 60.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Millefila.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (51%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Millefila. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

millefila.de

millefila.de

97 ms

www.millefila.de

www.millefila.de

222 ms

style.css

style.css

181 ms

widget.css

widget.css

194 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

208 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

214 ms

styles.css

styles.css

190 ms

feedreading_blogroll.css

feedreading_blogroll.css

205 ms

client.css

client.css

367 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

377 ms

css

css

208 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

380 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

383 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

396 ms

feedreading_blogroll.js

feedreading_blogroll.js

396 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

562 ms

jquery.placeholder.min.js

jquery.placeholder.min.js

572 ms

custom.js

custom.js

562 ms

acss.css

acss.css

571 ms

e-201925.js

e-201925.js

19 ms

style.css

style.css

405 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

59 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

46 ms

style.css

style.css

40 ms

logo11.png

logo11.png

184 ms

header21.jpg

header21.jpg

192 ms

Luneau1.jpg

Luneau1.jpg

183 ms

BrokenSeed1.jpg

BrokenSeed1.jpg

189 ms

FrauLotte4_klein.jpg

FrauLotte4_klein.jpg

191 ms

StripyMailin1_850-1.jpg

StripyMailin1_850-1.jpg

189 ms

Tamar.jpg

Tamar.jpg

370 ms

hap2.jpg

hap2.jpg

365 ms

ChevronSocken.jpg

ChevronSocken.jpg

371 ms

about1.jpg

about1.jpg

378 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

385 ms

style.css

style.css

208 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

40 ms

menuicon.png

menuicon.png

346 ms

post-border.png

post-border.png

510 ms

socialicons.png

socialicons.png

500 ms

Strickbegriffe-englisch_deutsch_klein.jpg

Strickbegriffe-englisch_deutsch_klein.jpg

499 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

16 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

20 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

24 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

28 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

menuicon.png

menuicon.png

47 ms

post-border.png

post-border.png

46 ms

socialicons.png

socialicons.png

47 ms

search.png

search.png

47 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

9 ms

controls.png

controls.png

8 ms

border.png

border.png

9 ms

loading_background.png

loading_background.png

7 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

63 ms

menuicon.png

menuicon.png

264 ms

post-border.png

post-border.png

288 ms

search.png

search.png

289 ms

socialicons.png

socialicons.png

271 ms

loading_background.png

loading_background.png

435 ms

controls.png

controls.png

447 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

445 ms

border.png

border.png

464 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

416 ms

Accessibility Review

millefila.de accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

millefila.de best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

millefila.de SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Millefila.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Millefila.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

millefila.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Millefila. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: