Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

millerdanberry.com

Web Server's Default Page

Page Load Speed

526 ms in total

First Response

118 ms

Resources Loaded

353 ms

Page Rendered

55 ms

millerdanberry.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Millerdanberry content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about millerdanberry.com

Visit millerdanberry.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Millerdanberry.com page load time and found that the first response time was 118 ms and then it took 408 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

millerdanberry.com performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

millerdanberry.com

118 ms

default-server-index.js

222 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Millerdanberry.com, 50% (1 request) were made to Assets.plesk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (222 ms) relates to the external source Assets.plesk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 154.2 kB (15%)

Content Size

998.9 kB

After Optimization

844.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Millerdanberry.com main page is 998.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 499.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 149 B

  • Original 430 B
  • After minification 408 B
  • After compression 281 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149 B or 35% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 499.7 kB
  • After minification 494.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Millerdanberry images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 78.5 kB

  • Original 146.0 kB
  • After minification 145.0 kB
  • After compression 67.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 78.5 kB or 54% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 70.5 kB

  • Original 352.8 kB
  • After minification 349.8 kB
  • After compression 282.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Millerdanberry.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Millerdanberry. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

millerdanberry.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

millerdanberry.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

millerdanberry.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Millerdanberry.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Millerdanberry.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Millerdanberry. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: