1.4 sec in total
261 ms
932 ms
181 ms
Click here to check amazing Milpak content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about milpak.com
Since its inception in 1967, Milpak has provided its customers with competitive pricing, quality and unsurpassed customer services on Labels and Tags.
Visit milpak.comWe analyzed Milpak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 261 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
milpak.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
261 ms
65 ms
9 ms
128 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Milpak.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (317 ms) belongs to the original domain Milpak.com.
Page size can be reduced by 68.9 kB (14%)
497.1 kB
428.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Milpak.com main page is 497.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 397.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Milpak needs image optimization as it can save up to 49.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 763 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Milpak.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 41% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (38%)
29
18
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Milpak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.milpak.com
261 ms
normalize.css
65 ms
jquery.min.js
9 ms
modernizr.full.min.js
128 ms
style.css
160 ms
css
20 ms
style.css
161 ms
design.css
161 ms
scripts.js
164 ms
functional.css
166 ms
style-light.css
234 ms
all.frontend.min.js
236 ms
ga.js
22 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
96 ms
logo.png
192 ms
youtube.png
96 ms
4.jpg
191 ms
21.jpg
220 ms
building.jpg
223 ms
1.jpg
254 ms
body-repeat.jpg
126 ms
list-bullet.png
190 ms
mail-suppliesv2.jpg
263 ms
label-and-tags.jpg
262 ms
capabilities.jpg
317 ms
contact-us.jpg
278 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
loading-icon-128x128.gif
195 ms
light-arrows.png
227 ms
font
15 ms
milpak.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
milpak.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
milpak.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Milpak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Milpak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
milpak.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Milpak. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: