4.4 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.9 sec
362 ms
Visit mindboard.com now to see the best up-to-date Mindboard content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mindboard.com
Mindboard is a consulting and development firm specializing in modernization projects for local, state, and federal government clients.
Visit mindboard.comWe analyzed Mindboard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
mindboard.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value4.2 s
43/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
1110 ms
1121 ms
20 ms
20 ms
60 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Mindboard.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Mindboard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 412.8 kB (8%)
5.3 MB
4.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Mindboard.com main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 386.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mindboard images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (16%)
19
16
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mindboard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
mindboard.com
1110 ms
mindboard.com
1121 ms
jquery-3.3.1.slim.min.js
20 ms
jquery-3.3.1.slim.min.js
20 ms
js
60 ms
mindboard_logo.png
56 ms
32157948945_c05da5721f_o_d.jpg
58 ms
mindboard.com
72 ms
linkedin.png
113 ms
medium.png
112 ms
VinayPande.jpg
154 ms
mindboard-email.jpg
155 ms
GuruG.png
481 ms
RachelVera.jpg
523 ms
ZeynoDodd.png
547 ms
AntoineRJWright.jpg
567 ms
JothiprakashV.jpg
591 ms
EricMuccino.jpeg
614 ms
twitter.png
655 ms
js
48 ms
analytics.js
16 ms
collect
43 ms
mindboard.com accessibility score
mindboard.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
mindboard.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mindboard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mindboard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mindboard.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mindboard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: