Tools & Wizards About Us
minigal.dk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

minigal.dk

No website is currently present on this hostname

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

492 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

121 ms

minigal.dk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Minigal content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about minigal.dk

The website you are trying to reach could be suspended, deleted or DNS could be incorrect

Visit minigal.dk

Key Findings

We analyzed Minigal.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 492 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Minigal.dk rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

minigal.dk performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.179

67/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

minigal.dk

492 ms

mediabox.css

160 ms

slimbox.css

210 ms

screen.css

262 ms

mootools.js

362 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Minigal.dk, 17% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (492 ms) belongs to the original domain Minigal.dk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 115.1 kB (50%)

Content Size

228.4 kB

After Optimization

113.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Minigal.dk main page is 228.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 107.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 12.1 kB
  • After minification 11.1 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 225 B

  • Original 4.2 kB
  • After minification 4.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Minigal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 104.6 kB
  • After minification 102.9 kB
  • After compression 100.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-96%

Potential reduce by 103.0 kB

  • Original 107.4 kB
  • After minification 11.2 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Minigal.dk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 103.0 kB or 96% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (69%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Minigal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

minigal.dk

minigal.dk

492 ms

mediabox.css

mediabox.css

160 ms

slimbox.css

slimbox.css

210 ms

screen.css

screen.css

262 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

362 ms

slimbox.js

slimbox.js

261 ms

click-tracker.js

click-tracker.js

254 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

21 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

19 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

27 ms

ga.js

ga.js

10 ms

print.css

print.css

114 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

32 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

120 ms

paypal.gif

paypal.gif

176 ms

ca-pub-6989379229856482.js

ca-pub-6989379229856482.js

103 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

92 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

94 ms

collect

collect

144 ms

leaf.gif

leaf.gif

145 ms

ads

ads

206 ms

osd.js

osd.js

35 ms

ads

ads

295 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

38 ms

abg.js

abg.js

64 ms

favicon

favicon

95 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

100 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

74 ms

s

s

46 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

21 ms

Accessibility Review

minigal.dk accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

minigal.dk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

minigal.dk SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Minigal.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Minigal.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

minigal.dk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Minigal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: