2.5 sec in total
372 ms
1.5 sec
651 ms
Click here to check amazing Minilinq content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about minilinq.com
Minilinq offers free url shortener to create short links.This custom url shortener offer many features like retargeting, custom domains and much more! Start for FREE.
Visit minilinq.comWe analyzed Minilinq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 372 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
minilinq.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
65/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value220 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
372 ms
17 ms
369 ms
376 ms
560 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Minilinq.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (649 ms) belongs to the original domain Minilinq.com.
Page size can be reduced by 88.3 kB (18%)
481.4 kB
393.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Minilinq.com main page is 481.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 209.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.8 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Minilinq images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 16.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.8 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Minilinq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (42%)
36
21
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Minilinq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
minilinq.com
372 ms
all.min.css
17 ms
select2.min.css
369 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
376 ms
style.min.css
560 ms
css2
31 ms
bundle.pack.js
649 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
381 ms
clipboard.min.js
382 ms
app.min.js
458 ms
server.min.js
464 ms
js
106 ms
css
20 ms
auto_site_logo.png
109 ms
landing.png
263 ms
profiles.png
263 ms
filters.png
109 ms
qrcodes.png
264 ms
us.svg
142 ms
fr.svg
181 ms
gb.svg
182 ms
wp.svg
228 ms
slack.svg
270 ms
shortcuts.svg
269 ms
gtm.svg
317 ms
facebook.svg
351 ms
zapier.svg
352 ms
bing.svg
353 ms
twitter.svg
357 ms
snapchat.svg
358 ms
reddit.svg
406 ms
ga.svg
440 ms
linkedin.svg
440 ms
pinterest.svg
444 ms
quora.svg
445 ms
tiktok.svg
446 ms
aroll.svg
494 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXNigDp6_dAyM.ttf
117 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXNigDp6_dAyM.ttf
157 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K5fQNigDp6_dAyM.ttf
177 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
164 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
130 ms
minilinq.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
minilinq.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
minilinq.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Minilinq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Minilinq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
minilinq.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Minilinq. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: