19.3 sec in total
1 sec
14.1 sec
4.2 sec
Welcome to miraclepackaging.in homepage info - get ready to check Miracle Packaging best content right away, or after learning these important things about miraclepackaging.in
Call or contact MIRACLE PACKAGING a leading Manufacturer, Supplier of Epe Packaging Foam, EPE Foam Packing Material, Epe Packaging Foam, Expanded Polyethylene Foam, EPE Foam Rolls and other EPE Packag...
Visit miraclepackaging.inWe analyzed Miraclepackaging.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 18.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
miraclepackaging.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value2,310 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.495
16/100
15%
Value8.2 s
40/100
10%
1034 ms
2540 ms
42 ms
62 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Miraclepackaging.in, 42% (46 requests) were made to Cpimg.tistatic.com and 29% (32 requests) were made to Tiimg.tistatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.3 sec) relates to the external source Cpimg.tistatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 240.8 kB (21%)
1.2 MB
930.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Miraclepackaging.in main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 697.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 239.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 239.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Miracle Packaging images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 185 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 78 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Miraclepackaging.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (44%)
100
56
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Miracle Packaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
miraclepackaging.in
1034 ms
www.miraclepackaging.in
2540 ms
jquery.js
42 ms
jquery_ui_sunny.css
62 ms
intlTelInput.css
40 ms
search.js
65 ms
jquery_ui_main.js
63 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
69 ms
slick.css
63 ms
slick.min.js
63 ms
StaticPopup.css
6 ms
StaticPopup.css
583 ms
css
28 ms
jquery.simplyscroll.js
12 ms
wz_tooltip.js
19 ms
tip_balloon.js
15 ms
intlTelInput.js
39 ms
jquery.validate.js
31 ms
request_a_callback.css
27 ms
analytics.js
90 ms
mob-icon.png
212 ms
template_photo_11.jpg
1270 ms
sZlLdRyC6CRYbkEaCA.ttf
209 ms
sZlEdRyC6CRYZrI5GLZyQw.ttf
215 ms
sZlEdRyC6CRYZuo4GLZyQw.ttf
232 ms
sZlEdRyC6CRYZp4-GLZyQw.ttf
238 ms
sZlEdRyC6CRYZvo_GLZyQw.ttf
292 ms
lang-arrow.png
201 ms
en.jpg
200 ms
es.jpg
252 ms
fr.jpg
237 ms
de.jpg
231 ms
it.jpg
257 ms
zh_CN.jpg
254 ms
ja.jpg
248 ms
ko.jpg
254 ms
ar.jpg
273 ms
pt.jpg
289 ms
logo_101116.png
1385 ms
go.png
297 ms
send_inq_Logo.svg
283 ms
trust_stamp_logo_big.gif
316 ms
inq-icon.png
303 ms
sms-icon.png
329 ms
tradeindiamember.gif
317 ms
Arrow.png
326 ms
template_photo_12.jpg
1866 ms
template_photo_13.jpg
889 ms
template_photo_14.jpg
548 ms
template_photo_15.jpg
533 ms
EPE-Foam-Fitment.jpg
2348 ms
EPE-Fitment.jpg
1596 ms
Bubble-Pouch.jpg
2819 ms
Stretch-Wrap-Film.jpg
2149 ms
Plastic-Stretch-Film.jpg
1985 ms
Stretch-Wrap-Film.jpg
2544 ms
EPE-Foam-Roll.jpg
2254 ms
Air-Bubble-Roll.jpg
2344 ms
Air-Bubble-Roll.jpg
2506 ms
Bubble-Pouch.jpg
2890 ms
Air-Bubble-Pouch.jpg
5658 ms
EPE-Fitment.jpg
3627 ms
Round-Cutting-EPE-Fitment.jpg
4543 ms
EPE-Adhesive-Foam.jpg
3777 ms
EVA-Foam-Fitment.jpg
3172 ms
EPE-Foam-Fitment.jpg
3225 ms
EPE-Foam-Fitment.jpg
4470 ms
EPE-Pouch.jpg
3591 ms
EPE-Pouch.jpg
3923 ms
EPE-Foam-Pouch.jpg
3985 ms
EPE-Foam-Sheet.jpg
3806 ms
EPE-Sheet.jpg
5160 ms
EPE-Sheet.jpg
4270 ms
Epe-Fitment-Sheet.jpg
4334 ms
Brown-Paper-Angle-Board.jpg
5546 ms
Corrugated-Paper-Angle-Board.jpg
4683 ms
PU-Foam-Fitment.jpg
4960 ms
EPE-Foam-Sheet.jpg
5245 ms
EPE-Foam-Sheet.jpg
7461 ms
Air-Bubble-Sheet-Roll.jpg
5297 ms
Air-Bubble-Film-Roll.jpg
5516 ms
bullet.png
285 ms
collect
25 ms
collect
38 ms
collect
36 ms
stemb.gif
155 ms
stemt.gif
156 ms
l.gif
160 ms
lb.gif
171 ms
b.gif
186 ms
rb.gif
188 ms
r.gif
179 ms
rt.gif
180 ms
t.gif
201 ms
lt.gif
210 ms
background.gif
200 ms
collect
31 ms
collect
40 ms
ga-audiences
37 ms
ga-audiences
27 ms
Transparent-Air-Bubble-Roll.jpg
5102 ms
EPE-Foam-Sheet.jpg
5491 ms
Air-Bubble-Pouch.jpg
5022 ms
HMHD-Pouch.jpg
4657 ms
EPE-Foam-Roll.jpg
4975 ms
Industrial-Adhesive-Tape.jpg
4130 ms
EPE-Foam-Sheet.jpg
8284 ms
EPE-Sheet.jpg
4649 ms
EPE-Bonded-Fitment.jpg
4593 ms
Fitment-Foam.jpg
4939 ms
miraclepackaging.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
miraclepackaging.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
miraclepackaging.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Miraclepackaging.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Miraclepackaging.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
miraclepackaging.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Miracle Packaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: