Tools & Wizards About Us
miraclescraper.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

miraclescraper.com

The Ice SCRAPER #1 Get Snow Off Your Car In Just SECONDS!

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

55 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

264 ms

miraclescraper.com screenshot

About Website

Visit miraclescraper.com now to see the best up-to-date Miracle SCRAPER content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about miraclescraper.com

Tired Of Wasting Hours Getting Ice & Snow Off Your Car? The Magical Ice Scraper Is The Clever Tool That Does It In Just Seconds!

Visit miraclescraper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Miraclescraper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

miraclescraper.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,510 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.194

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

miraclescraper.com

55 ms

www.miraclescraper.com

548 ms

order-445880761605494020956

353 ms

lander.css

121 ms

all.css

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Miraclescraper.com, 41% (23 requests) were made to Theicescraper.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (785 ms) relates to the external source Theicescraper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 598.4 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Miraclescraper.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 163.9 kB

  • Original 199.4 kB
  • After minification 199.3 kB
  • After compression 35.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 163.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 24 B

  • Original 206.9 kB
  • After minification 206.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Miracle SCRAPER images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 434.5 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 862.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 434.5 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 87.2 kB
  • After minification 87.2 kB
  • After compression 87.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Miraclescraper.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (41%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Miracle SCRAPER. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

miraclescraper.com

miraclescraper.com

55 ms

www.miraclescraper.com

www.miraclescraper.com

548 ms

order-445880761605494020956

order-445880761605494020956

353 ms

lander.css

lander.css

121 ms

all.css

all.css

118 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

145 ms

css

css

74 ms

application.js

application.js

217 ms

js

js

105 ms

js

js

152 ms

proof.js

proof.js

110 ms

css

css

88 ms

lander.js

lander.js

493 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

141 ms

pushcrew.js

pushcrew.js

410 ms

handlebars.min.js

handlebars.min.js

80 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

109 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

257 ms

w.js

w.js

294 ms

closemodal.png

closemodal.png

352 ms

377120723

377120723

651 ms

bogo1.png

bogo1.png

273 ms

Main-logo-White2.png

Main-logo-White2.png

233 ms

download.jpg

download.jpg

422 ms

usa-badge-v2.png

usa-badge-v2.png

383 ms

all-certs.png

all-certs.png

380 ms

seal1.png

seal1.png

326 ms

grey-lock.png

grey-lock.png

323 ms

MS_Testi011.jpg

MS_Testi011.jpg

441 ms

MS_Testi010.jpg

MS_Testi010.jpg

414 ms

MS_Testi05.jpg

MS_Testi05.jpg

431 ms

MS_Testi014.jpg

MS_Testi014.jpg

429 ms

MS_Testi08.jpg

MS_Testi08.jpg

484 ms

MS_Testi07.jpg

MS_Testi07.jpg

487 ms

MS_Testi06.jpg

MS_Testi06.jpg

572 ms

MS_Testi03.jpg

MS_Testi03.jpg

539 ms

MS_Testi012.jpg

MS_Testi012.jpg

667 ms

MS_Testi02.jpg

MS_Testi02.jpg

530 ms

MS_Testi015.jpg

MS_Testi015.jpg

785 ms

MS_Testi01.jpg

MS_Testi01.jpg

591 ms

arrow-flash-small.gif

arrow-flash-small.gif

381 ms

index.html

index.html

172 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

215 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

221 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

233 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

123 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

57 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

110 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

122 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

123 ms

firebase.js

firebase.js

113 ms

proxy.js

proxy.js

52 ms

vendor.js

vendor.js

378 ms

arrow-flash-small.gif

arrow-flash-small.gif

62 ms

settings.luckyorange.net

settings.luckyorange.net

18 ms

api.js

api.js

23 ms

Accessibility Review

miraclescraper.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

miraclescraper.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

miraclescraper.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Miraclescraper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Miraclescraper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

miraclescraper.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Miracle SCRAPER. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: