Tools & Wizards About Us
miracletoolings.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

miracletoolings.com

Index of /

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

222 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

606 ms

miracletoolings.com screenshot

About Website

Visit miracletoolings.com now to see the best up-to-date Miracletoolings content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about miracletoolings.com

Visit miracletoolings.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Miracletoolings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

miracletoolings.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.02

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

miracletoolings.com

222 ms

bootstrap.min.css

201 ms

font-awesome.min.css

212 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

210 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

214 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Miracletoolings.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Miracletoolings.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 194.4 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Miracletoolings.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 76.2 kB

  • Original 83.1 kB
  • After minification 56.9 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.2 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.2 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 82.5 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Miracletoolings images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 237.3 kB
  • After minification 237.3 kB
  • After compression 224.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 131.1 kB
  • After minification 131.1 kB
  • After compression 108.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Miracletoolings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (63%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Miracletoolings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

miracletoolings.com

miracletoolings.com

222 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

201 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

212 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

210 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

214 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

216 ms

loader.min.css

loader.min.css

217 ms

style.css

style.css

404 ms

flaticon.min.css

flaticon.min.css

306 ms

lc_lightbox.css

lc_lightbox.css

307 ms

skin-9.css

skin-9.css

310 ms

switcher.css

switcher.css

312 ms

rev-slider-12.css

rev-slider-12.css

313 ms

settings.css

settings.css

418 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

420 ms

css

css

38 ms

css

css

55 ms

css

css

60 ms

jquery-2.2.0.min.js

jquery-2.2.0.min.js

508 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

498 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

525 ms

bootstrap-select.min.js

bootstrap-select.min.js

505 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

533 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

533 ms

counterup.min.js

counterup.min.js

531 ms

waypoints-sticky.min.js

waypoints-sticky.min.js

609 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

610 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

627 ms

stellar.min.js

stellar.min.js

631 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

626 ms

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.js

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.js

630 ms

custom.js

custom.js

712 ms

lc_lightbox.lite.js

lc_lightbox.lite.js

714 ms

switcher.js

switcher.js

728 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

826 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

735 ms

revolution-plugin.js

revolution-plugin.js

844 ms

rev-script-12.js

rev-script-12.js

814 ms

logo-9.png

logo-9.png

814 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

1130 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

839 ms

Ceratizit.jpg

Ceratizit.jpg

748 ms

osg.jpg

osg.jpg

809 ms

vargus.jpg

vargus.jpg

817 ms

srs.jpg

srs.jpg

831 ms

xcut.jpg

xcut.jpg

809 ms

zavenir.jpg

zavenir.jpg

918 ms

yg.jpg

yg.jpg

820 ms

intro-pic2.jpg

intro-pic2.jpg

825 ms

im1.jpg

im1.jpg

843 ms

im2.jpg

im2.jpg

943 ms

im3.jpg

im3.jpg

813 ms

im4.jpg

im4.jpg

808 ms

im5.jpg

im5.jpg

738 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

37 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

759 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_JHIS11zU.woff

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_JHIS11zU.woff

52 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_wHIS11zU.woff

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN_wHIS11zU.woff

57 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8lG4S11zU.woff

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8lG4S11zU.woff

58 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8XG4S11zU.woff

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN8XG4S11zU.woff

57 ms

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN9JG4S11zU.woff

LYjYdG7kmE0gV69VVPPdFl06VN9JG4S11zU.woff

57 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

823 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

814 ms

bg-plus.png

bg-plus.png

817 ms

ap-section.jpg

ap-section.jpg

817 ms

revicons90c6.woff

revicons90c6.woff

408 ms

Accessibility Review

miracletoolings.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

miracletoolings.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

miracletoolings.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Miracletoolings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Miracletoolings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

miracletoolings.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Miracletoolings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: