7.3 sec in total
522 ms
4.9 sec
1.8 sec
Click here to check amazing Mirage content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mirage.ru
Сеть кинотеатров Мираж Синема — 21 современных кинотеатров, 174 комфортабельных кинозалов, оснащенных по последнему слову техники, и более 10.000 посадочных мест!
Visit mirage.ruWe analyzed Mirage.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 522 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
mirage.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value2,240 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.411
24/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
522 ms
969 ms
32 ms
273 ms
542 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Mirage.ru, 34% (37 requests) were made to Cdn.mirage.ru and 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.mirage.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 561.4 kB (6%)
8.9 MB
8.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Mirage.ru main page is 8.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 110.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.0 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 400.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mirage images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 42.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mirage.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (30%)
97
68
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mirage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mirage.ru
522 ms
www.mirage.ru
969 ms
css2
32 ms
bootstrap-grid.css
273 ms
style.css
542 ms
adapt.css
408 ms
scrollbar.css
275 ms
datepicker.min.css
277 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
465 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.js
591 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
511 ms
jquery.maskedinput.js
511 ms
jquery.toshowhide.js
511 ms
slick.min.js
590 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
848 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
599 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
598 ms
jquery.nice-select.min.js
599 ms
datepicker.min.js
778 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
778 ms
jquery.mcustomscrollbar.concat.min.js
779 ms
swiper.min.js
25 ms
main.js
777 ms
spxl.js
1203 ms
analytics.js
107 ms
gtm.js
188 ms
p6099.jpg
970 ms
p6115.jpg
931 ms
p6095.jpg
945 ms
p6113.jpg
937 ms
p6110.jpg
932 ms
p6050.jpg
934 ms
p6104.jpg
1062 ms
p6106.jpg
1065 ms
p6118.jpg
1067 ms
p6119.jpg
1071 ms
p6085.jpg
1073 ms
p6021.jpg
1085 ms
p6114.jpg
1196 ms
p6096.jpg
1199 ms
p6116.jpg
1701 ms
p6103.jpg
1208 ms
p6122.jpg
1212 ms
p6108.jpg
1229 ms
p6056.jpg
1698 ms
p6078.jpg
1698 ms
p5953.jpg
1699 ms
p6087.jpg
1699 ms
s6066.jpg
2130 ms
s6123.jpg
2403 ms
s6136.jpg
2813 ms
s6111.jpg
2115 ms
s6125.jpg
2117 ms
s6124.jpg
1917 ms
s6129.jpg
2056 ms
s6128.jpg
2194 ms
s6127.jpg
2255 ms
s6126.jpg
2392 ms
s6092.jpg
2417 ms
s6094.jpg
2333 ms
s6093.jpg
2399 ms
s6091.jpg
2472 ms
logo.svg
318 ms
a754.jpg
432 ms
a753.jpg
655 ms
a752.jpg
656 ms
a751.jpg
431 ms
a749.jpg
431 ms
a727.jpg
637 ms
a507.jpg
656 ms
a667.jpg
656 ms
a495.jpg
655 ms
a592.jpg
657 ms
a593.jpg
798 ms
a551.jpg
798 ms
a514.jpg
798 ms
a516.jpg
799 ms
a498.jpg
798 ms
a366.jpg
797 ms
a347.jpg
935 ms
a111.jpg
934 ms
a21.jpg
929 ms
apple.svg
931 ms
google.svg
920 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9Y3tco5q6.woff
27 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w9Y3tco5q6.woff
68 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w9Y3tco5q6.woff
89 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9Y3tco5q6.woff
144 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9Y3tco5q6.woff
146 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9Y3tco5q6.woff
144 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9Y3tco5q6.woff
143 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew9Y3tco5q6.woff
88 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw9Y3tco5q6.woff
144 ms
collect
55 ms
js
69 ms
code.js
815 ms
tag.js
1288 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
20 ms
openapi.a2ed73393cad04481c1dfb3f7794921f.js
259 ms
rtrg
143 ms
rtrg
280 ms
s6090.jpg
1608 ms
sync-loader.js
943 ms
counter
125 ms
dyn-goal-config.js
652 ms
advert.gif
606 ms
1
136 ms
tracker
126 ms
mirage.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mirage.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
mirage.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mirage.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mirage.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mirage.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mirage. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: