Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

mirage2000records.co.uk

mirage2000records.co.uk

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

138 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

542 ms

mirage2000records.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit mirage2000records.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Mirage2000re Co Rds content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mirage2000records.co.uk

This domain may be for sale!

Visit mirage2000records.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Mirage2000records.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mirage2000records.co.uk performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.298

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mirage2000records.co.uk

138 ms

nouturnrecords.co.uk

148 ms

thevinylstore.wordpress.com

9 ms

thevinylstore.wordpress.com

142 ms

138 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mirage2000records.co.uk, 15% (8 requests) were made to S1.wp.com and 13% (7 requests) were made to S2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (740 ms) relates to the external source Youtube.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 833.9 kB (65%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

447.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Mirage2000records.co.uk main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 656.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 221 B

  • Original 511 B
  • After minification 465 B
  • After compression 290 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 221 B or 43% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 326 B

  • Original 6.2 kB
  • After minification 5.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mirage2000re Co Rds images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 474.2 kB

  • Original 656.5 kB
  • After minification 545.3 kB
  • After compression 182.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 474.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 359.2 kB

  • Original 618.7 kB
  • After minification 616.5 kB
  • After compression 259.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mirage2000records.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 359.2 kB or 58% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (53%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mirage2000re Co Rds. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mirage2000records.co.uk accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

mirage2000records.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

mirage2000records.co.uk SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mirage2000records.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mirage2000records.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mirage2000re Co Rds. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: