2.7 sec in total
488 ms
1.6 sec
601 ms
Click here to check amazing Misgl content for Hungary. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about misgl.com
Operation Centers In The Philippines, UK, Texas, Hungary, Romania & Poland ➤ We Offer Cost Effective BPO Services To Help Your Business Grow! ➤ Contact Us Today!
Visit misgl.comWe analyzed Misgl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 488 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
misgl.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value26.8 s
0/100
10%
Value1,010 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value11.2 s
19/100
10%
488 ms
94 ms
144 ms
144 ms
140 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Misgl.com, 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (488 ms) relates to the external source Transcosmos.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 108.7 kB (13%)
850.9 kB
742.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Misgl.com main page is 850.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 557.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Misgl images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Misgl.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (85%)
53
8
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Misgl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
transcosmos.co.uk
488 ms
autoptimize_f134703a9bccfc8223ef94c1df908eb0.css
94 ms
style.min.css
144 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
144 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
140 ms
front-flex.min.css
139 ms
sow-social-media-buttons-flat-4058b36d0f04.css
139 ms
frontend.min.css
150 ms
flatpickr.min.css
195 ms
select2.min.css
187 ms
pagenavi-css.css
163 ms
bootstrap.min.css
170 ms
style.css
179 ms
sweetalert.css
191 ms
css
140 ms
style.css
198 ms
blocks.css
193 ms
addtoany.min.css
204 ms
page.js
188 ms
jquery.min.js
211 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
210 ms
addtoany.min.js
231 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
232 ms
flatpickr.min.js
237 ms
select2.min.js
234 ms
sweetalert.min.js
229 ms
lazysizes.min.js
381 ms
sow-features-default-a519da74b78f-4.css
381 ms
style.css
381 ms
sow-social-media-buttons-flat-4a359437509a.css
380 ms
style.css
373 ms
cookie-law-info-table.css
374 ms
frontend.min.js
444 ms
gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js
443 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
442 ms
bootstrap.min.js
442 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
442 ms
navigation.js
441 ms
global.js
465 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
366 ms
styling.min.js
336 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
354 ms
tti.min.js
309 ms
tccl.min.js
276 ms
eso.e18d3993.js
230 ms
gtm.js
296 ms
logo.png
175 ms
banner.jpg
196 ms
jizOREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRg8T88bjFuXOnduhLsWkDtDM.ttf
138 ms
jizOREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRg8T88bjFuXOnduhcMWkDtDM.ttf
163 ms
jizOREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRg8T88bjFuXOnduh8MKkDtDM.ttf
165 ms
jizOREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRg8T88bjFuXOnduhrsKkDtDM.ttf
164 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
58 ms
it-support-icon.png
29 ms
customer-support-icon.png
27 ms
ecom-icon.png
29 ms
sm.23.html
58 ms
analytics.js
58 ms
hotjar-1226763.js
154 ms
jizMREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRiUawTk7f45UM9y05oZ8RODFR-M.ttf
15 ms
jizMREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRiUawTk7f45UM9y05oYiRODFR-M.ttf
13 ms
jizMREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRiUawTk7f45UM9y05oaiQ-DFR-M.ttf
15 ms
jizMREVItHgc8qDIbSTKq4XkRiUawTk7f45UM9y05ob8Q-DFR-M.ttf
109 ms
misgl.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
misgl.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
misgl.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Misgl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Misgl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
misgl.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Misgl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: