2.8 sec in total
112 ms
2.4 sec
355 ms
Click here to check amazing Mission Point Plan content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about missionpointplan.com
If you carry a badge and work for the Federal Governement – you already know your benefits are more complex than other FEDS. Understanding which is the best option for you takes more than knowledge. I...
Visit missionpointplan.comWe analyzed Missionpointplan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 112 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
missionpointplan.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value6.9 s
7/100
25%
Value8.8 s
15/100
10%
Value1,280 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.398
25/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
112 ms
300 ms
103 ms
25 ms
155 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Missionpointplan.com, 14% (11 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (577 ms) belongs to the original domain Missionpointplan.com.
Page size can be reduced by 205.8 kB (10%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Missionpointplan.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 122.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mission Point Plan images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Missionpointplan.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (80%)
75
15
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mission Point Plan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
missionpointplan.com
112 ms
www.missionpointplan.com
300 ms
style.css
103 ms
css
25 ms
formreset.min.css
155 ms
formsmain.min.css
167 ms
readyclass.min.css
165 ms
browsers.min.css
171 ms
style-static.min.css
279 ms
style.css
171 ms
jquery.min.js
261 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
217 ms
jquery.json.min.js
216 ms
gravityforms.min.js
218 ms
conditional_logic.min.js
217 ms
utils.min.js
270 ms
widgets.js
108 ms
js
69 ms
js
112 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
225 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
225 ms
style.css
227 ms
idle-timer.min.js
320 ms
custom.js
321 ms
scripts.min.js
371 ms
smoothscroll.js
321 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
322 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
322 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
327 ms
dom-ready.min.js
328 ms
hooks.min.js
332 ms
i18n.min.js
369 ms
a11y.min.js
370 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
456 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
456 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
457 ms
common.js
457 ms
es6-promise.auto.min.js
458 ms
jspdf.min.js
461 ms
html2canvas.min.js
459 ms
html2pdf.min.js
459 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
530 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
403 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
358 ms
salvattore.js
415 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
412 ms
custom.js
411 ms
idle-timer.min.js
421 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
375 ms
jquery.mobile.js
412 ms
easypiechart.js
412 ms
logo.png
294 ms
architecture-backlight-beach-1706616-medium-size-1.jpg
433 ms
detroit-background.jpg
577 ms
Susan-TSP-400x250.jpg
293 ms
calm-400x250.jpg
433 ms
poker-400x250.jpg
434 ms
mp-logo-white.png
404 ms
modules.woff
400 ms
js
101 ms
analytics.js
94 ms
js
198 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
146 ms
collect
147 ms
collect
149 ms
flash-4244923_1280.jpg
247 ms
settings
149 ms
timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js
26 ms
missionptplan
80 ms
style.min.css
56 ms
polyfills-3b821eda8863adcc4a4b.js
43 ms
runtime-a697c5a1ae32bd7e4d42.js
52 ms
modules.20f98d7498a59035a762.js
101 ms
main-fd9ef5eb169057cda26d.js
94 ms
_app-88bf420a57d49e33be53.js
91 ms
%5BscreenName%5D-c33f0b02841cffc3e9b4.js
92 ms
_buildManifest.js
98 ms
_ssgManifest.js
102 ms
missionpointplan.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
missionpointplan.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
missionpointplan.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Missionpointplan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Missionpointplan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
missionpointplan.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mission Point Plan. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: