3 sec in total
79 ms
2.6 sec
411 ms
Visit misssite.com now to see the best up-to-date Miss Site content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about misssite.com
Create your new site in just 5 minutes, it's totally free! Don't waste your money on expensive design firms, do it your self!
Visit misssite.comWe analyzed Misssite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
misssite.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value2,150 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.039
99/100
15%
Value22.5 s
1/100
10%
79 ms
809 ms
32 ms
74 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Misssite.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (809 ms) belongs to the original domain Misssite.com.
Page size can be reduced by 115.8 kB (8%)
1.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Misssite.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 694.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Miss Site images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 68.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 68.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Misssite.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.3 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (55%)
76
34
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Miss Site. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
misssite.com
79 ms
misssite.com
809 ms
style.css
32 ms
bootstrap.min.css
74 ms
style.css
112 ms
storefront.css
80 ms
slicknav.css
80 ms
buttons.css
83 ms
popup.css
86 ms
jquery.min.js
129 ms
dropdown.js
107 ms
modernizr.min.js
106 ms
jquery.slicknav.js
117 ms
sweetalert2@8
29 ms
promise-polyfill
32 ms
default.js
118 ms
layerslider.css
178 ms
css
43 ms
styles.css
178 ms
jquery.min.js
180 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
179 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
193 ms
greensock.js
191 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
191 ms
external-tracking.min.js
190 ms
banner_slider.css
192 ms
slider.js
234 ms
client:platform.js
37 ms
jquery.validate.js
236 ms
jquery.bpopup.min.js
237 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
239 ms
comment-reply.min.js
238 ms
index.js
282 ms
index.js
283 ms
css
21 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
110 ms
analytics.js
104 ms
Co_23Fh0zVI
199 ms
flag1.png
96 ms
flag3.png
96 ms
topicon1.png
96 ms
topicon2.png
95 ms
logo.png
95 ms
new_slidebanner1.jpg
142 ms
banner_transparent_shape.png
138 ms
video_boxback_bg.jpg
153 ms
video-bg.png
139 ms
filmen_tag.png
138 ms
Template-image1.jpg
140 ms
Template-image2.jpg
155 ms
Template-image3.jpg
162 ms
Template-image4.jpg
160 ms
Template-image6.jpg
167 ms
Template-image7.jpg
157 ms
features_bg.png
165 ms
icon_holder.png
184 ms
feature_icon1.png
185 ms
feature_icon2.png
189 ms
feature_icon3.png
187 ms
feature_icon4.png
190 ms
feature_icon5.png
193 ms
feature_icon6.png
241 ms
feature_icon7.png
241 ms
testimonial_bg.jpg
477 ms
logo2.png
190 ms
social_icons.png
262 ms
segoeui.woff
541 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
82 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
83 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
85 ms
seguisb.woff
423 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
42 ms
collect
32 ms
js
101 ms
www-player.css
8 ms
www-embed-player.js
26 ms
base.js
125 ms
ad_status.js
205 ms
XSOeYOgfx9Jh0OnrBRoGZITK3RITQeOfJZOsiQTg9Ss.js
115 ms
embed.js
40 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
35 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
35 ms
Create
109 ms
al0g0fgs
219 ms
id
85 ms
misssite.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
misssite.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
misssite.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Misssite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Misssite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
misssite.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Miss Site. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: