Tools & Wizards About Us
miteprint.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

miteprint.com

Printing quality work in the heart of Chiago | MI•TE Print

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

513 ms

miteprint.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to miteprint.com homepage info - get ready to check MI TE Print best content right away, or after learning these important things about miteprint.com

Chicago printing company ready to help you make an impact with offset, digital, wide format, thermography, foil and letterpress printing.

Visit miteprint.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Miteprint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

miteprint.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value32.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,360 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

miteprint.com

30 ms

miteprint.com

169 ms

js

68 ms

uap8dfq.css

137 ms

style.min.css

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Miteprint.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Dq2vr556ucrd7.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (27%)

Content Size

6.0 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Miteprint.com main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 70.3 kB

  • Original 86.8 kB
  • After minification 86.8 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 5.3 MB
  • After minification 3.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, MI TE Print needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 448.7 kB
  • After minification 448.7 kB
  • After compression 446.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 176.2 kB
  • After minification 176.2 kB
  • After compression 174.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Miteprint.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (70%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MI TE Print. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

miteprint.com

miteprint.com

30 ms

miteprint.com

miteprint.com

169 ms

js

js

68 ms

uap8dfq.css

uap8dfq.css

137 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

41 ms

styles.css

styles.css

50 ms

style.css

style.css

41 ms

nectar-slider.css

nectar-slider.css

37 ms

portfolio.css

portfolio.css

42 ms

style.css

style.css

49 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

54 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

52 ms

style.css

style.css

64 ms

header-secondary-nav.css

header-secondary-nav.css

55 ms

magnific.css

magnific.css

80 ms

css

css

46 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

78 ms

ascend.css

ascend.css

80 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

81 ms

salient-dynamic-styles.css

salient-dynamic-styles.css

80 ms

css

css

63 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

82 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

80 ms

zl-multine-files.js

zl-multine-files.js

82 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

47 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

56 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

57 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

51 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

57 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

61 ms

index.js

index.js

61 ms

index.js

index.js

67 ms

anime.js

anime.js

71 ms

nectar-slider.js

nectar-slider.js

76 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

73 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

76 ms

salient-portfolio.js

salient-portfolio.js

77 ms

salient-social.js

salient-social.js

77 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

90 ms

jquery.mousewheel.js

jquery.mousewheel.js

85 ms

priority.js

priority.js

88 ms

transit.js

transit.js

91 ms

api.js

api.js

42 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

275 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

114 ms

hoverintent.js

hoverintent.js

96 ms

magnific.js

magnific.js

100 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

98 ms

init.js

init.js

105 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

100 ms

index.js

index.js

100 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

258 ms

p.css

p.css

30 ms

wedding-rule-badge-2021.pngw3.webp

wedding-rule-badge-2021.pngw3.webp

1892 ms

logo-e1584985912299.png

logo-e1584985912299.png

46 ms

fullsizeoutput_2c3e-scaled.jpg

fullsizeoutput_2c3e-scaled.jpg

619 ms

sarah-brian-500x500.jpg

sarah-brian-500x500.jpg

48 ms

reception-invite-500x500.jpg

reception-invite-500x500.jpg

339 ms

frank-and-wendy-invitation-500x500.jpg

frank-and-wendy-invitation-500x500.jpg

48 ms

emily-and-spencer-invitation-500x500.jpg

emily-and-spencer-invitation-500x500.jpg

47 ms

IMG_2639-500x500.jpeg

IMG_2639-500x500.jpeg

133 ms

IMG_1924-500x500.jpeg

IMG_1924-500x500.jpeg

133 ms

ED2A067B-BE82-4571-AFE5-182952CFAEEC-500x500.jpeg

ED2A067B-BE82-4571-AFE5-182952CFAEEC-500x500.jpeg

133 ms

IMG_1779-500x500.jpeg

IMG_1779-500x500.jpeg

134 ms

amanda-invite-500x500.jpeg

amanda-invite-500x500.jpeg

134 ms

Alexandra-and-Peter-Wedding-Suite-500x500.jpg

Alexandra-and-Peter-Wedding-Suite-500x500.jpg

135 ms

Chloe-and-Robert-Wedding-Invitation-500x500.jpg

Chloe-and-Robert-Wedding-Invitation-500x500.jpg

133 ms

Rosemary-Beach-Wedding-Invitation-500x500.jpg

Rosemary-Beach-Wedding-Invitation-500x500.jpg

135 ms

salient-dynamic-styles.css

salient-dynamic-styles.css

115 ms

Screen-Shot-2021-01-20-at-6.23.35-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2021-01-20-at-6.23.35-PM.png

121 ms

slider-1.jpg

slider-1.jpg

114 ms

Hospitality-Homepage.jpg

Hospitality-Homepage.jpg

115 ms

Corp-1.jpg

Corp-1.jpg

116 ms

custom-desing-hero.jpg

custom-desing-hero.jpg

117 ms

kmKnZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNZaxY.ttf

kmKnZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNZaxY.ttf

193 ms

d

d

132 ms

d

d

132 ms

kmKhZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNcWxEQCQ.ttf

kmKhZrc3Hgbbcjq75U4uslyuy4kn0qNcWxEQCQ.ttf

408 ms

Lovelo_Black.woff

Lovelo_Black.woff

191 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

409 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

436 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

408 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

435 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

436 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

435 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

301 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

283 ms

Accessibility Review

miteprint.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

miteprint.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

miteprint.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Miteprint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Miteprint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

miteprint.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of MI TE Print. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: