Tools & Wizards About Us
mixonsite.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

mixonsite.com

Foam Concrete Provider of GEOFILL® Versatile Lightweight Solution

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

93 ms

Resources Loaded

825 ms

Page Rendered

143 ms

mixonsite.com screenshot

About Website

Visit mixonsite.com now to see the best up-to-date Mixonsite content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mixonsite.com

MixOnSite is a nationwide contractor specializing in low density foam concrete. We provide owners, engineers, and contractors with unique, cost effective solutions to their geotechnical and undergroun...

Visit mixonsite.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mixonsite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 93 ms and then it took 968 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mixonsite.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.207

60/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mixonsite.com

93 ms

mixonsite.com

205 ms

gtm.js

59 ms

jquery.min.js

24 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Mixonsite.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (224 ms) belongs to the original domain Mixonsite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 70.3 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mixonsite.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 996.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 18.9 kB

  • Original 25.0 kB
  • After minification 21.8 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 996.8 kB
  • After minification 987.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mixonsite images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 18.9 kB

  • Original 74.9 kB
  • After minification 74.9 kB
  • After compression 55.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 72.4 kB
  • After minification 71.2 kB
  • After compression 49.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mixonsite.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (48%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mixonsite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mixonsite.com

mixonsite.com

93 ms

mixonsite.com

mixonsite.com

205 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

59 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

24 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

32 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

92 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

120 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

130 ms

style.css

style.css

161 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.js

164 ms

style.css

style.css

138 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.css

142 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

152 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

157 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

196 ms

placeholder.js

placeholder.js

170 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

193 ms

brands.css

brands.css

184 ms

solid.css

solid.css

186 ms

sbtools.js

sbtools.js

190 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

168 ms

Cematrix-MOS_Logo.svg

Cematrix-MOS_Logo.svg

28 ms

mos-tunnel-backfill.jpg

mos-tunnel-backfill.jpg

115 ms

mos-annular-space-grouting.jpg

mos-annular-space-grouting.jpg

101 ms

mos-abandonments.jpg

mos-abandonments.jpg

75 ms

mos-load-reducing-fill.jpg

mos-load-reducing-fill.jpg

113 ms

mos-underwater-placement.jpg

mos-underwater-placement.jpg

139 ms

geofillLDP.jpg

geofillLDP.jpg

62 ms

geofill-ld-pervious-right-banner.jpg

geofill-ld-pervious-right-banner.jpg

123 ms

NICOR_Aux_Sable_Case_Study-1.jpg

NICOR_Aux_Sable_Case_Study-1.jpg

130 ms

Cematrix-MOS_Logo_white.svg

Cematrix-MOS_Logo_white.svg

128 ms

Medallion.png

Medallion.png

141 ms

adeasel.png

adeasel.png

143 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

141 ms

left-arrow.png

left-arrow.png

153 ms

right-arrow.png

right-arrow.png

152 ms

ROCK.woff

ROCK.woff

167 ms

dinengschrift-webfont.woff

dinengschrift-webfont.woff

171 ms

univers-condensed-webfont.woff

univers-condensed-webfont.woff

167 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

224 ms

univers-webfont.woff

univers-webfont.woff

173 ms

41 ms

Accessibility Review

mixonsite.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

mixonsite.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mixonsite.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mixonsite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mixonsite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mixonsite.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mixonsite. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: