Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

mlajournals.org

PMLA / Publications of the Modern Language Association of America | PMLA | Cambridge Core

Page Load Speed

15.2 sec in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

14.8 sec

Page Rendered

327 ms

mlajournals.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mlajournals content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mlajournals.org

All issues of PMLA / Publications of the Modern Language Association of America - Brent Hayes Edwards

Visit mlajournals.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Mlajournals.org page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 15.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mlajournals.org performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.1 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,670 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.273

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.8 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mlajournals.org

32 ms

coreredirect.cambridge.org

320 ms

all-issues

13127 ms

sentry.min.js

116 ms

css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mlajournals.org, 81% (65 requests) were made to Cambridge.org and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (13.1 sec) relates to the external source Cambridge.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 616.5 kB (62%)

Content Size

999.2 kB

After Optimization

382.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Mlajournals.org main page is 999.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 640.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 586.4 kB

  • Original 640.9 kB
  • After minification 639.8 kB
  • After compression 54.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 586.4 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 29.9 kB

  • Original 212.2 kB
  • After minification 182.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mlajournals needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 227 B

  • Original 146.0 kB
  • After minification 146.0 kB
  • After compression 145.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (81%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mlajournals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

mlajournals.org accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Best Practices

mlajournals.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mlajournals.org SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mlajournals.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mlajournals.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mlajournals. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: