905 ms in total
12 ms
508 ms
385 ms
Visit moat.com now to see the best up-to-date Moat content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about moat.com
Discover the measurement and marketing analytics suite designed to help advertisers, publishers, and platforms measure media performance across the breadth of their digital and TV advertising campaign...
Visit moat.comWe analyzed Moat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 893 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
moat.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value6.0 s
47/100
10%
Value830 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.909
3/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
12 ms
77 ms
21 ms
47 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Moat.com, 67% (44 requests) were made to D39qxjx2pcysy1.cloudfront.net and 17% (11 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (221 ms) relates to the external source D39qxjx2pcysy1.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (57%)
2.2 MB
920.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Moat.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 146.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Moat needs image optimization as it can save up to 146.4 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 732.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 732.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 291.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Moat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 291.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (41%)
58
34
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Moat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
moat.com
12 ms
www.moat.com
77 ms
font-awesome.min.css
21 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.css
47 ms
ffkievit.css
37 ms
global.74ed9dad.css
57 ms
video-js.css
42 ms
video-speed.css
46 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
37 ms
swfobject.min.js
18 ms
jquery.min.js
14 ms
bootstrap.min.js
14 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
14 ms
knockout-min.js
18 ms
highcharts.js
19 ms
exporting.js
18 ms
no-data-to-display.js
19 ms
jquery.history.min.js
32 ms
app.cdb4bbc4.js
221 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
42 ms
analytics.js
143 ms
1d8754e24e44177f8d3af142f6c788c5_thumb.jpg
136 ms
drop-down-arrow.png
123 ms
font-awesome.min.css
23 ms
Light_repeating-pattern.png
21 ms
mobile-banner.png
19 ms
popup-mobile-banner.png
61 ms
autocomplete-ajax-loader-gray.gif
18 ms
autocomplete-ajax-loader.gif
61 ms
moat_white_clear.png
61 ms
analytics_hero_stock_bg.jpg
167 ms
left_flag_w_shadow.png
61 ms
right_flag_w_shadow.png
61 ms
unilever.png
62 ms
nyt.png
61 ms
twitter_large.png
62 ms
nestle.png
160 ms
aol.png
161 ms
clorox.png
162 ms
vice.png
160 ms
facebook_grey.png
161 ms
kellogs.png
162 ms
vox.png
166 ms
iab_thumb.jpg
163 ms
bloomberg_tv_thumb.jpg
167 ms
no_clicks_thumb.jpg
163 ms
unilever_text_logo.png
162 ms
video_audio_blue.png
164 ms
logos_network_blue.png
166 ms
layers_alerts_msgs_blue.png
164 ms
twitter_white.png
169 ms
autocomplete-ajax-loader-large.gif
166 ms
moat_small_logo.png
166 ms
twitter.png
167 ms
facebook.png
166 ms
ed7f83b648f53f11df524be52a852177_thumb.jpg
163 ms
d37d19d1d8f02d88edaf1e921c470e65793e7cf0.png
169 ms
ea54982c880af7356ed79b52fc1740ff_thumb.jpg
168 ms
2E4E7E_4_0.woff
169 ms
2E4E7E_2_0.woff
167 ms
2E4E7E_3_0.woff
168 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
165 ms
2E4E7E_1_0.woff
163 ms
collect
101 ms
collect
130 ms
ad_banner.png
91 ms
moat.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
moat.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
moat.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Moat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
moat.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Moat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: