3 sec in total
13 ms
2.3 sec
676 ms
Visit mobileapptracking.com now to see the best up-to-date Mobile Apptracking content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mobileapptracking.com
Build high quality user experiences with best-in-class deep linking, all while measuring the complete journey of your users. From desktop to mobile web to native app, at every touchpoint across organi...
Visit mobileapptracking.comWe analyzed Mobileapptracking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
mobileapptracking.com performance score
13 ms
9 ms
174 ms
413 ms
284 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Mobileapptracking.com, 26% (20 requests) were made to Ddof8wj1m41ni.cloudfront.net and 13% (10 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (413 ms) relates to the external source Tune.com.
Page size can be reduced by 446.3 kB (38%)
1.2 MB
741.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Mobileapptracking.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 470.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mobile Apptracking needs image optimization as it can save up to 55.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 201.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201.4 kB or 43% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 143.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mobileapptracking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 143.3 kB or 62% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (62%)
58
22
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mobile Apptracking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
mobileapptracking.com
13 ms
www.mobileapptracking.com
9 ms
www.tune.com
174 ms
www.tune.com
413 ms
fonts.css
284 ms
framework.css
188 ms
styles.css
257 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
262 ms
asc
178 ms
jquery.min.js
82 ms
E-v1.js
117 ms
framework-min.js
282 ms
site-specific-min.js
293 ms
6074A5D5358546E37.css
255 ms
icon-external-link.jpg
196 ms
seal
30 ms
tune-logo.png
194 ms
tmc-dashboard.png
290 ms
ebay.png
285 ms
sony.png
285 ms
nick.png
284 ms
staples.png
197 ms
supercell.png
196 ms
flipkart.png
203 ms
expedia.png
201 ms
zillow.png
248 ms
line.png
248 ms
sephora.png
282 ms
kabam.png
283 ms
gilt.png
282 ms
draftkings.png
283 ms
badge.png
282 ms
gtm.js
240 ms
gtm.js
279 ms
tune-logo-sitebrand.png
263 ms
hero-home-3.jpg
264 ms
hero-home-2.jpg
278 ms
EI1HjEAXcW88KMYS+kTyJsedbBIs7ngNvZN7uGkrWr+DztrPSVbIcGbhZHj8kOqxjfHq38+6OD7+U4hdkxT5M
39 ms
bzkpXyXJk4OI8eUh0WMf49G7n3Z0cfinFLwbCPnQ=
38 ms
bzkpXyXJk4OI8eUh0WMf49G7n3Z0cfinFLxbvPng=
37 ms
lOIXZMU+TA==
38 ms
bzkpXyXJk4OI8eUh0WMf49G7n3Z0cfinFLwbCPnQ=
38 ms
bzkpXyXJk4OI8eUh0WMf49G7n3Z0cfinFLxbvPng=
37 ms
aiPnA=
37 ms
FaKXzIRPyg=
37 ms
EI1HjEAXcWS8KMYS+kTyJsec7BIt7ngNvZN7uGkrWr+DzprPSVbIcGbg4T+4THdcxPr7beXcnx19K8Qv2oj5w
37 ms
ICXeysqVML+KD4Rz0SNUxRwbz2rxBn0jeRRjE3fIljc8SB4KfOG11CygAWft52VrpLlyMBFefyQ6LCR8en1zus7PvxWil8yET8o
37 ms
icotune.ttf
220 ms
iframe_shim
235 ms
ufhxicrnkj.json
183 ms
yzy6lirfbk.json
180 ms
g8fgpyb317.json
176 ms
ufory6271g.json
324 ms
analytics.js
81 ms
fbevents.js
323 ms
insight.min.js
281 ms
oct.js
199 ms
2888241030.js
375 ms
7228.js
273 ms
linkid.js
129 ms
adsct
152 ms
adsct
152 ms
collect
40 ms
collect
108 ms
collect
65 ms
s
142 ms
t.js
72 ms
u
90 ms
149 ms
ga-audiences
85 ms
event
60 ms
pd.js
198 ms
s
11 ms
analytics
217 ms
18 ms
l
30 ms
mobileapptracking.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mobileapptracking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mobileapptracking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mobileapptracking.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mobile Apptracking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: