Tools & Wizards About Us
mobilelifecycle.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

mobilelifecycle.net

Mobile LifeCycle | Don't Just Recycle, LifeCycle

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

961 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

77 ms

mobilelifecycle.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mobile Life Cycle content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mobilelifecycle.net

We offer a premium solution for companies and organizations that have end of use wireless and mobile devices

Visit mobilelifecycle.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Mobilelifecycle.net page load time and found that the first response time was 961 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mobilelifecycle.net performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mobilelifecycle.net

961 ms

analytics.js

19 ms

style.min.css

51 ms

be.css

109 ms

animations.min.css

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Mobilelifecycle.net, 18% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (961 ms) belongs to the original domain Mobilelifecycle.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 104.7 kB (17%)

Content Size

605.7 kB

After Optimization

500.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mobilelifecycle.net main page is 605.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 297.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 86.3 kB

  • Original 108.2 kB
  • After minification 106.7 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 15.0 kB
  • After minification 13.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mobile Life Cycle images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 297.2 kB
  • After minification 297.2 kB
  • After compression 296.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 16.2 kB

  • Original 185.3 kB
  • After minification 185.3 kB
  • After compression 169.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mobilelifecycle.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (81%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mobile Life Cycle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mobilelifecycle.net

mobilelifecycle.net

961 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

19 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

51 ms

be.css

be.css

109 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

62 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

67 ms

jplayer.blue.monday.min.css

jplayer.blue.monday.min.css

68 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

76 ms

css

css

33 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

95 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

89 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

87 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

195 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

199 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

css

css

24 ms

css

css

24 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

161 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

160 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

160 ms

debouncedresize.min.js

debouncedresize.min.js

160 ms

magnificpopup.min.js

magnificpopup.min.js

170 ms

menu.js

menu.js

171 ms

visible.min.js

visible.min.js

172 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

171 ms

jplayer.min.js

jplayer.min.js

173 ms

enllax.min.js

enllax.min.js

176 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

178 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

176 ms

js

js

130 ms

blue-seal-293-61-bbb-70094890.png

blue-seal-293-61-bbb-70094890.png

81 ms

Mobile_LifeCycle1.png

Mobile_LifeCycle1.png

74 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

74 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwkzuA_qNBQ.ttf

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwkzuA_qNBQ.ttf

79 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

84 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

13 ms

2-cO9IRs1JiJN1FRAMjTN5zd9vgsFF_5asQTb6hZ2JKZRekViesCzRRXnJOo.ttf

2-cO9IRs1JiJN1FRAMjTN5zd9vgsFF_5asQTb6hZ2JKZRekViesCzRRXnJOo.ttf

13 ms

2-cO9IRs1JiJN1FRAMjTN5zd9vgsFF_5asQTb6hZ2JKZIukViesCzRRXnJOo.ttf

2-cO9IRs1JiJN1FRAMjTN5zd9vgsFF_5asQTb6hZ2JKZIukViesCzRRXnJOo.ttf

16 ms

2-cO9IRs1JiJN1FRAMjTN5zd9vgsFF_5asQTb6hZ2JKZou4ViesCzRRXnJOo.ttf

2-cO9IRs1JiJN1FRAMjTN5zd9vgsFF_5asQTb6hZ2JKZou4ViesCzRRXnJOo.ttf

16 ms

2-cO9IRs1JiJN1FRAMjTN5zd9vgsFF_5asQTb6hZ2JKZ_O4ViesCzRRXnJOo.ttf

2-cO9IRs1JiJN1FRAMjTN5zd9vgsFF_5asQTb6hZ2JKZ_O4ViesCzRRXnJOo.ttf

16 ms

Accessibility Review

mobilelifecycle.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mobilelifecycle.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mobilelifecycle.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mobilelifecycle.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mobilelifecycle.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mobilelifecycle.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mobile Life Cycle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: