5.3 sec in total
89 ms
3.4 sec
1.8 sec
Visit mobilerq.com now to see the best up-to-date MobileRQ content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mobilerq.com
announces the acquisition of MobileRQ plus launches a new pricing structure at their Third Annual Summer Celebration this week.
Visit mobilerq.comWe analyzed Mobilerq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
mobilerq.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value18.7 s
0/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value1,540 ms
13/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
89 ms
643 ms
310 ms
505 ms
683 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mobilerq.com, 70% (54 requests) were made to S34035.pcdn.co and 5% (4 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 227.6 kB (13%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Mobilerq.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 96.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. MobileRQ images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 93.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mobilerq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 93.1 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (82%)
66
12
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MobileRQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mobilerq.com
89 ms
643 ms
gtm.js
310 ms
style.css
505 ms
font-awesome.min.css
683 ms
font-awesome.min.css
597 ms
style.css
676 ms
ascend.css
652 ms
fonts.css
797 ms
grid-system.css
601 ms
style.css
595 ms
single.css
667 ms
element-recent-posts.css
677 ms
responsive.css
698 ms
select2.css
696 ms
menu-dynamic.css
696 ms
js_composer.min.css
733 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
702 ms
style.css
760 ms
set-referrer-cookie.js
759 ms
localize.js
662 ms
localizejs.js
765 ms
jquery.min.js
764 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
782 ms
st_insights.js
667 ms
ssba.css
779 ms
style-non-critical.css
783 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
794 ms
core.css
782 ms
simple-dropdown.css
780 ms
salient-social.js
793 ms
ssba.js
793 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
792 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
833 ms
priority.js
833 ms
transit.min.js
833 ms
waypoints.js
834 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
834 ms
hoverintent.min.js
831 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
837 ms
anime.min.js
826 ms
superfish.js
826 ms
init.js
832 ms
optimize.js
383 ms
pixel
350 ms
stickkit.js
358 ms
touchswipe.min.js
269 ms
select2.min.js
269 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
220 ms
67298239380946136.css
227 ms
analytics.js
61 ms
collect
24 ms
collect
319 ms
Kochava-New-Horizontal-Wht-Solid.png
146 ms
Kochava-Hero-Banner-2.jpg
202 ms
facebook.png
193 ms
twitter.png
192 ms
diggit.png
192 ms
linkedin.png
190 ms
tumblr.png
191 ms
reddit.png
197 ms
buffer.png
193 ms
CustomerRetention-Blog-Feature-v1-600x403.jpg
194 ms
Privacy-Block-Feature-copy-600x403.jpg
193 ms
%E2%80%A2-Default-Social-2022-1-600x403.jpg
192 ms
choice.js
437 ms
kochava-ts.min.js
802 ms
ga-audiences
1075 ms
app.js
991 ms
1+jvzChiN
376 ms
MKGI0=
375 ms
HpAawDtjwP9fo78woYjQ==
371 ms
HpAawDtjwP9fo78woYjQ==
371 ms
icomoon.woff
534 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
534 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
532 ms
tracking.js
274 ms
mobilerq.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mobilerq.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mobilerq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mobilerq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mobilerq.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of MobileRQ. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: