1.2 sec in total
61 ms
714 ms
425 ms
Click here to check amazing Mochapbeauty content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mochapbeauty.com
Forsale Lander
Visit mochapbeauty.comWe analyzed Mochapbeauty.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
mochapbeauty.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0.8 s
100/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value2.8 s
97/100
10%
61 ms
142 ms
245 ms
243 ms
88 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mochapbeauty.com, 62% (16 requests) were made to Afternic.com and 27% (7 requests) were made to Img6.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (339 ms) relates to the external source Img6.wsimg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 284.7 kB (78%)
365.5 kB
80.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Mochapbeauty.com main page is 365.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 253.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.4 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 215.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mochapbeauty.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 215.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (92%)
24
2
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mochapbeauty. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mochapbeauty.com
61 ms
mochapbeauty.com
142 ms
uxcore2.min.css
245 ms
noheader.min.css
243 ms
7165b8d166aac1e6.css
88 ms
620cfa3cf5a9b1b1.css
230 ms
f2912c4c434ed822.css
122 ms
polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js
170 ms
webpack-f5527e0188740701.js
170 ms
main-999f8182f179b553.js
166 ms
framework-f7ba292b22b03fed.js
133 ms
_app-74cd4fb80f14b27b.js
189 ms
670-0de5acd3b36156c1.js
168 ms
584-a5891a19697d2d0f.js
238 ms
787-b8887dd5c5d965da.js
338 ms
%5Bdomain%5D-0c2aac4ebf4cce77.js
237 ms
_buildManifest.js
226 ms
_ssgManifest.js
333 ms
_middlewareManifest.js
332 ms
polyfill.min.js
333 ms
vendor.min.js
339 ms
uxcore2.min.js
328 ms
heartbeat.js
325 ms
noheader.min.js
326 ms
aksb.min.js
199 ms
utag.js
149 ms
mochapbeauty.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mochapbeauty.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
mochapbeauty.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mochapbeauty.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mochapbeauty.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mochapbeauty.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mochapbeauty. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: