10.8 sec in total
1.1 sec
9.2 sec
570 ms
Click here to check amazing Mockengineering content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mockengineering.com
Upgrade your network cabling for VoIP data and video. Mock Engineering, Inc. in Southwest FL installs and maintains data cabling for VoIP, Video and Security. Call us for fast network cabling.
Visit mockengineering.comWe analyzed Mockengineering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 9.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
mockengineering.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value12.7 s
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.998
2/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
1062 ms
1119 ms
1086 ms
1156 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Mockengineering.com, 45% (41 requests) were made to Assets.myregisteredsite.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.4 sec) relates to the external source 23364518.cstsite.com.
Page size can be reduced by 260.3 kB (14%)
1.8 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Mockengineering.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mockengineering images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 24% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 991 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mockengineering.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 991 B or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (54%)
81
37
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mockengineering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mockengineering.com
1062 ms
mockengineering.com
1119 ms
www.mockengineering.com
1086 ms
www.mockengineering.com
1156 ms
js
86 ms
jquery.js
148 ms
button.css
118 ms
browserBehavior.js
42 ms
utils.js
98 ms
shared.js
118 ms
navigation.js
131 ms
uaDefaultStylesReset.css
117 ms
popup.js
159 ms
ResourceLoader.js
118 ms
webcom_copyright_kw.js
115 ms
googleFonts.css
18 ms
css
36 ms
navigation.js
19 ms
core.js
20 ms
socialmedialink.js
20 ms
jqueryvalidate.js
24 ms
form.js
23 ms
mapquest.js
22 ms
footercontact.js
35 ms
hoverIntent.js
19 ms
bgIframe.js
19 ms
superfish.js
21 ms
handler.js
20 ms
helper.js
20 ms
positioner.js
23 ms
structure.css
34 ms
smltemplates.js
36 ms
socialmedialink.css
37 ms
utils.js
36 ms
resources.js
40 ms
templates.js
40 ms
form.css
50 ms
form_generic.css
51 ms
templates.js
52 ms
webmap.js
56 ms
mapquest.css
53 ms
jquery.json-2.2.min.js
55 ms
templates.js
66 ms
footercontact.css
66 ms
132746623.png
81 ms
phone-black.png
180 ms
132785941.jpg
148 ms
132787614_scaled_391x309.jpg
178 ms
132787540.jpg
255 ms
132787761.png
334 ms
132787366.jpg
380 ms
132787882.jpg
424 ms
132788881.jpg
467 ms
132788934.jpeg
510 ms
132788887.jpg
689 ms
136965510.png
739 ms
136965511.png
745 ms
132794531.png
765 ms
132794567.jpeg
764 ms
136965559.png
771 ms
132802958.png
773 ms
132794953.jpeg
818 ms
132794951.jpg
809 ms
132794950.jpeg
842 ms
132802957.jpeg
798 ms
132791934.png
831 ms
132953588.png
837 ms
132795228.jpeg
861 ms
132795235.png
906 ms
132794674.png
862 ms
132735457.png
4358 ms
100489183.jpeg
988 ms
132736947.jpg
1091 ms
52195840.jpeg
891 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
108 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
137 ms
q5uCsoe5IOB2-pXv9UcNExN8gQ.ttf
124 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf
124 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf
124 ms
placeholder.png
72 ms
com.web.servlet.map;jsessionid=false
893 ms
socialmedialink-spritesheet.png
80 ms
logger.php
73 ms
jquery.js
56 ms
jquery.ba-bbq.min.js
18 ms
URI.js
24 ms
css
19 ms
place-card.css
20 ms
com.web.servlet.map;jsessionid=7A23B663DC9812D8A2EB6CD5D74C28F7
212 ms
directions.png
20 ms
js
55 ms
mockengineering.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
mockengineering.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
mockengineering.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mockengineering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mockengineering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mockengineering.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mockengineering. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: