3.6 sec in total
507 ms
2.9 sec
258 ms
Visit moffer.ru now to see the best up-to-date Moffer content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about moffer.ru
Директ мейл — отличный способ массовой рассылки почты и инструмент e-mail маркетинга. С помощью сервиса Маливер Ваши клиенты будут заинтересованы в постоянном сотрудничестве.
Visit moffer.ruWe analyzed Moffer.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 507 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
moffer.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value3.8 s
56/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
507 ms
121 ms
235 ms
238 ms
241 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Moffer.ru, 14% (11 requests) were made to Vk.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Cp.onicon.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (761 ms) relates to the external source Cp.onicon.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 978.6 kB (63%)
1.5 MB
566.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Moffer.ru main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Moffer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 766.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 766.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Moffer.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (69%)
75
23
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Moffer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
moffer.ru
507 ms
styles.less.css
121 ms
highslide.css
235 ms
style1.css
238 ms
highslide.min.css
241 ms
highslide-full.packed.js
352 ms
flowplayer-3.2.9.min.js
239 ms
calendar.css
244 ms
ru.js
348 ms
cookie.js
370 ms
widgets.js
374 ms
calendar.packed.js
376 ms
feedback.factory.min.js
377 ms
highslide-full.packed.js
584 ms
jquery-1.9.0.min.js
599 ms
site-scripts.js
472 ms
regform.js
489 ms
86a5825.js
619 ms
hotlink.css
489 ms
hotlink.js
492 ms
openapi.js
394 ms
top100.jcn
379 ms
analytics.js
61 ms
moffer-logo__0__0.png
118 ms
icon-gplus.png
118 ms
slide-1_2.png
236 ms
slide-2_1.png
120 ms
slide-3_1.png
243 ms
1.png
119 ms
4.png
234 ms
2.png
235 ms
5.png
237 ms
3.png
236 ms
6.png
349 ms
video-preview.png
471 ms
moffer.png
349 ms
close-pic.png
351 ms
sdk.js
269 ms
drop-btn.png
348 ms
drop-arrows.png
358 ms
icon-login.png
471 ms
nav-top-hover.png
474 ms
slide-text-ico2.png
461 ms
slide-text-ico.png
460 ms
slider-controls.png
464 ms
moffer-btn.png
564 ms
all-comments.png
580 ms
services_sprite.png
580 ms
search-btn.png
579 ms
list-type.png
579 ms
upload.gif
131 ms
widget_like.php
279 ms
hit
255 ms
open_sans-s-b.woff
682 ms
open_sans-r.woff
647 ms
watch.js
187 ms
collect
42 ms
collect
55 ms
top100.scn
129 ms
loader.js
309 ms
simple_loader.js
330 ms
watch.js
475 ms
49 ms
xd_arbiter.php
224 ms
xd_arbiter.php
429 ms
loader_nav19127_3.js
135 ms
lite.css
136 ms
lite.js
519 ms
lang3_0.js
270 ms
widgets.css
269 ms
xdm.js
270 ms
al_like.js
270 ms
api.js
104 ms
simple_loader.js
407 ms
b9bd572bf6d0964f00b5719a313bd71e.js
98 ms
advert.gif
90 ms
bootstrap.min.js
98 ms
like_widget.png
131 ms
1
91 ms
onicon.site.min.css
195 ms
onicon.site.min.js
761 ms
moffer.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
moffer.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
moffer.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moffer.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Moffer.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
moffer.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Moffer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: