Tools & Wizards About Us
moleremovalstlouis.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

moleremovalstlouis.com

St Louis Lawn Mole Pest Control | Yard Mole Removal

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

154 ms

Resources Loaded

669 ms

Page Rendered

183 ms

moleremovalstlouis.com screenshot

About Website

Visit moleremovalstlouis.com now to see the best up-to-date Mole Removal St Louis content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about moleremovalstlouis.com

St Louis Mole Removal, Long Term Ground Mole Lawn Treatment, Yard Mole Trapper Exterminator, Mole Trapping Pest Control

Visit moleremovalstlouis.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Moleremovalstlouis.com page load time and found that the first response time was 154 ms and then it took 852 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

moleremovalstlouis.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.08

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

profesionalcon1.godaddysites.com

154 ms

site.css

113 ms

duel.js

45 ms

js

88 ms

scc-c2.min.js

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Moleremovalstlouis.com, 13% (4 requests) were made to Nebula.wsimg.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Img4.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (292 ms) relates to the external source Nebula.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 324.9 kB (55%)

Content Size

595.9 kB

After Optimization

270.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Moleremovalstlouis.com main page is 595.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 324.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 46.5 kB

  • Original 59.5 kB
  • After minification 59.4 kB
  • After compression 13.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 26 B

  • Original 97.0 kB
  • After minification 97.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mole Removal St Louis images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 184.9 kB

  • Original 324.3 kB
  • After minification 324.1 kB
  • After compression 139.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.9 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 93.5 kB

  • Original 115.1 kB
  • After minification 114.9 kB
  • After compression 21.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Moleremovalstlouis.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 93.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (68%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mole Removal St Louis. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

profesionalcon1.godaddysites.com

profesionalcon1.godaddysites.com

154 ms

site.css

site.css

113 ms

duel.js

duel.js

45 ms

js

js

88 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

5 ms

jq.js

jq.js

42 ms

d47132ff1e6549eb60b1a9a030554286

d47132ff1e6549eb60b1a9a030554286

75 ms

customForm.published.js

customForm.published.js

55 ms

subNavigation.js

subNavigation.js

57 ms

cookiemanager.js

cookiemanager.js

56 ms

iebackground.js

iebackground.js

66 ms

6d8b5b8c1bd69fd38330e8200d55d593

6d8b5b8c1bd69fd38330e8200d55d593

238 ms

df7f5ef08b3e92016c0693d3256076b5

df7f5ef08b3e92016c0693d3256076b5

64 ms

19da5042ebda3c4bb43d3a26780ac354

19da5042ebda3c4bb43d3a26780ac354

292 ms

js

js

164 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

68 ms

regexhelper.js

regexhelper.js

22 ms

api.guid.js

api.guid.js

26 ms

jquery.xDomainRequest.js

jquery.xDomainRequest.js

16 ms

tipper.js

tipper.js

21 ms

datepicker.js

datepicker.js

21 ms

jquery.watermark.js

jquery.watermark.js

20 ms

util.window.js

util.window.js

23 ms

sf.tipper.js

sf.tipper.js

163 ms

sf.datepicker.js

sf.datepicker.js

162 ms

collect

collect

57 ms

8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-tbnfY3lCw.woff

8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-tbnfY3lCw.woff

50 ms

sf.core.pkg.js

sf.core.pkg.js

6 ms

app.css

app.css

28 ms

app.css

app.css

30 ms

Accessibility Review

moleremovalstlouis.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

moleremovalstlouis.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

moleremovalstlouis.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moleremovalstlouis.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Moleremovalstlouis.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

moleremovalstlouis.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mole Removal St Louis. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: