3.8 sec in total
60 ms
3.5 sec
258 ms
Click here to check amazing Money Journal content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about moneyjournal.com
Learn how to build a business online with Money Journal's online strategies, web development guides and conversion optimization tips.
Visit moneyjournal.comWe analyzed Moneyjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
moneyjournal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value6.0 s
47/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
60 ms
88 ms
38 ms
73 ms
107 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Moneyjournal.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Moneyjournal.disqus.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (676 ms) belongs to the original domain Moneyjournal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 210.6 kB (21%)
1.0 MB
811.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Moneyjournal.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 354.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Money Journal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 24.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 113.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Moneyjournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 113.2 kB or 46% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (80%)
87
17
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Money Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
moneyjournal.com
60 ms
www.moneyjournal.com
88 ms
style.min.css
38 ms
login-form.min.css
73 ms
member.min.css
107 ms
members.min.css
120 ms
dynamic-members.min.css
75 ms
latest-activities.min.css
133 ms
styles.css
139 ms
screen.min.css
131 ms
fonticons.css
163 ms
magnific-popup.css
190 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
222 ms
animation.css
234 ms
dashicons.min.css
247 ms
thickbox.css
201 ms
shortcodes.css
261 ms
custom.css
252 ms
jquery-liveedit.css
288 ms
wplms_front_end.css
341 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
333 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
349 ms
bootstrap.css
318 ms
fonticons.css
369 ms
chosen.css
388 ms
buddypress.css
421 ms
bbpress.css
433 ms
style.css
457 ms
style.css
453 ms
jquery.min.js
487 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
546 ms
confirm.min.js
566 ms
custom.js
541 ms
jquery-liveedit.js
596 ms
core.min.js
608 ms
mouse.min.js
587 ms
sortable.min.js
635 ms
slider.min.js
641 ms
datepicker.min.js
625 ms
wplms_front_end.js
616 ms
bootstrap.min.js
620 ms
nprogress.js
599 ms
comment_count.js
658 ms
comment_embed.js
646 ms
front.min.js
645 ms
jquery.knob.js
646 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
619 ms
masonry.min.js
605 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
616 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
612 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
611 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
616 ms
thickbox.js
619 ms
shortcodes.js
639 ms
course-module-js.min.js
676 ms
draggable.min.js
601 ms
droppable.min.js
588 ms
underscore.min.js
643 ms
wp-util.min.js
653 ms
backbone.min.js
619 ms
wp-playlist.min.js
636 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
627 ms
buddypress.js
599 ms
course.js
625 ms
modernizr.custom.js
625 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
590 ms
chosen.jquery.js
592 ms
sidebarEffects.js
541 ms
jquery.cookie.js
601 ms
custom.js
598 ms
logo-mj.png
481 ms
is-marketing-major-good-460x460.png
431 ms
featured-remote-work-statistics-460x305.jpg
443 ms
social-media-lead-generation-fb-460x241.jpg
539 ms
how-to-start-a-blog-feat.jpg
539 ms
leadpages-ft.jpg
550 ms
lead-qualification-feat.jpg
538 ms
generate-more-traffic-feat.png
512 ms
email-copywriting.jpg
527 ms
how-to-write-blog-feat.jpg
542 ms
count.js
24 ms
proximanova-regular-webfont.woff
19 ms
fonticon.woff
570 ms
fonticon.woff
549 ms
sales-funnel-feat.jpg
572 ms
proximanova-regular-webfont.woff
589 ms
analytics.js
73 ms
fbds.js
62 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
119 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
33 ms
js
68 ms
ga-audiences
85 ms
moneyjournal.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
moneyjournal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
moneyjournal.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moneyjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Moneyjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
moneyjournal.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Money Journal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: