6 sec in total
466 ms
5.4 sec
113 ms
Visit monitor.wiki now to see the best up-to-date Monitor content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about monitor.wiki
Specifications of desktop monitors, smart TVs and other types of displays. Comparisons of the specifications of different models, user reviews and ratings.
Visit monitor.wikiWe analyzed Monitor.wiki page load time and found that the first response time was 466 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
monitor.wiki performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value3.6 s
62/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value1,270 ms
19/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.7 s
29/100
10%
466 ms
929 ms
714 ms
39 ms
866 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Monitor.wiki, 12% (9 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Monitor.wiki.
Page size can be reduced by 40.4 kB (8%)
485.4 kB
445.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Monitor.wiki main page is 485.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 223.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Monitor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 378 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Monitor.wiki has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (42%)
69
40
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Monitor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
monitor.wiki
466 ms
monitor.wiki
929 ms
jquery-jvectormap-1.2.2.css
714 ms
bootstrap.css
39 ms
pace-theme-minimal.css
866 ms
font-awesome.css
689 ms
animate.css
681 ms
app.css
692 ms
app.skins.css
47 ms
adsbygoogle.js
63 ms
jquery.js
64 ms
pace.js
934 ms
tether.js
1324 ms
bootstrap.js
1395 ms
fastclick.js
1346 ms
constants.js
1363 ms
main.js
931 ms
tag.js
811 ms
fcf92094_w.jpg
682 ms
39582266_w.jpg
719 ms
ca591e7d_w.jpg
1121 ms
31e6202b_w.jpg
1146 ms
fd1e2073_w.jpg
1174 ms
02b32092_w.jpg
1199 ms
55821cc0_w.jpg
1325 ms
cf5a2049_w.jpg
1389 ms
8db2223c_w.jpg
2136 ms
cc102193_w.jpg
2168 ms
f9f9206c_w.jpg
2171 ms
a8d1211d_w.jpg
2171 ms
a10b1fd6_w.jpg
1333 ms
441765c_w.jpg
2187 ms
ba6e20e7_w.jpg
2187 ms
e0c42191_w.jpg
2462 ms
37691c7f_w.jpg
2472 ms
13d7108d_w.jpg
2489 ms
2b371a38_w.jpg
2497 ms
25901090_w.jpg
2683 ms
8e401a30_w.jpg
2716 ms
606d819_w.jpg
3081 ms
803f95c_w.jpg
3112 ms
7f071ba1_w.jpg
3147 ms
show_ads_impl.js
63 ms
zrt_lookup.html
55 ms
cookie.js
154 ms
integrator.js
147 ms
ads
1201 ms
ads
697 ms
ads
838 ms
advert.gif
573 ms
reactive_library.js
25 ms
integrator.js
84 ms
zrt_lookup.html
78 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
139 ms
css2
73 ms
13509971588325849552
151 ms
load_preloaded_resource.js
153 ms
abg_lite.js
170 ms
window_focus.js
192 ms
qs_click_protection.js
193 ms
rx_lidar.js
139 ms
fac60d4cdc0b8be56d9f8d6f9ac54a3d.js
124 ms
interstitial_ad_frame.js
540 ms
fullscreen_api_adapter.js
550 ms
one_click_handler_one_afma.js
539 ms
feedback_grey600_24dp.png
107 ms
settings_grey600_24dp.png
107 ms
icon.png
37 ms
14588372883557763140
535 ms
s
374 ms
css
225 ms
activeview
59 ms
1
291 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
271 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
271 ms
OLZMwUuXKff5QHkWgJZ5Acpn9ezP58Pxr98BvfUDCEE.js
16 ms
4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf
241 ms
4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf
243 ms
monitor.wiki accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
monitor.wiki best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
monitor.wiki SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Monitor.wiki can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Monitor.wiki main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
monitor.wiki
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Monitor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: