Tools & Wizards About Us
monogram.partners screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

monogram.partners

Monogram - The Differentiation Consultancy® & Design Studios

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

75 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

496 ms

monogram.partners screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Monogram content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about monogram.partners

UN-SAME YOURSELF! Standing apart from your competition and becoming a world leader starts with daring to do things differently. That's where we come in.

Visit monogram.partners

Key Findings

We analyzed Monogram.partners page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

monogram.partners performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,040 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.089

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

monogram.partners

75 ms

monogram.partners

374 ms

style.min.css

258 ms

style-index.css

1204 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

277 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Monogram.partners, 24% (16 requests) were made to Cdn.shortpixel.ai and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Monogram.partners.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 154.5 kB (50%)

Content Size

309.0 kB

After Optimization

154.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Monogram.partners main page is 309.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 184.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 154.4 kB

  • Original 184.3 kB
  • After minification 181.8 kB
  • After compression 29.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 154.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 117.0 kB
  • After minification 117.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Monogram images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 100 B

  • Original 7.7 kB
  • After minification 7.7 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (93%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Monogram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

monogram.partners

monogram.partners

75 ms

monogram.partners

monogram.partners

374 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

258 ms

style-index.css

style-index.css

1204 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

wpforms-full.min.css

277 ms

app.css

app.css

1259 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

231 ms

app.css

app.css

849 ms

style.css

style.css

357 ms

Messina-Sans-Book.css

Messina-Sans-Book.css

387 ms

Knockout-HTF28-JuniorFeatherwt.css

Knockout-HTF28-JuniorFeatherwt.css

402 ms

Knockout-HTF32-JuniorCruiserwt.css

Knockout-HTF32-JuniorCruiserwt.css

496 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

783 ms

ytprefs.min.css

ytprefs.min.css

582 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

405 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

333 ms

ytprefs.min.js

ytprefs.min.js

346 ms

js

js

48 ms

js

js

94 ms

site_tracking.js

site_tracking.js

836 ms

ai-2.0.min.js

ai-2.0.min.js

340 ms

app.js

app.js

847 ms

_0gsap.min.js

_0gsap.min.js

683 ms

_1DrawSVGPlugin.min.js

_1DrawSVGPlugin.min.js

1160 ms

_1SplitText.min.js

_1SplitText.min.js

657 ms

_2ScrollToPlugin.min.js

_2ScrollToPlugin.min.js

681 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1425 ms

animsition.js

animsition.js

1467 ms

bezier-easing.js

bezier-easing.js

972 ms

isInViewport.min.js

isInViewport.min.js

1124 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

1631 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

1744 ms

packery-mode.pkgd.js

packery-mode.pkgd.js

1876 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.js

jquery.hoverIntent.js

1915 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1691 ms

jquery.vide.js

jquery.vide.js

1747 ms

js.cookie.js

js.cookie.js

2413 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

2492 ms

mobile-detect.min.js

mobile-detect.min.js

2090 ms

odometer.min.js

odometer.min.js

2030 ms

perfect-scrollbar.min.js

perfect-scrollbar.min.js

2159 ms

PreventGhostClick.js

PreventGhostClick.js

2700 ms

raf.js

raf.js

2785 ms

scrollspy.js

scrollspy.js

2851 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

2463 ms

sticky-kit.min.js

sticky-kit.min.js

3181 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

2831 ms

thb_3dImg.js

thb_3dImg.js

3267 ms

typed.min.js

typed.min.js

3535 ms

Zhowler.core.min.js

Zhowler.core.min.js

3569 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

3164 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

3194 ms

fitvids.min.js

fitvids.min.js

3623 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

3151 ms

skrollr.min.js

skrollr.min.js

3169 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

3207 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

115 ms

MessinaSans-Book.otf

MessinaSans-Book.otf

24 ms

Knockout-HTF28-JuniorFeatherwt.otf

Knockout-HTF28-JuniorFeatherwt.otf

24 ms

Knockout-HTF32-JuniorCruiserwt.otf

Knockout-HTF32-JuniorCruiserwt.otf

25 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

426 ms

diffuser.js

diffuser.js

32 ms

prism.app-us1.com

prism.app-us1.com

119 ms

MGM_DE01_Background3.jpg

MGM_DE01_Background3.jpg

51 ms

MGM_DE01_Background2.jpg

MGM_DE01_Background2.jpg

28 ms

327853199

327853199

282 ms

api.js

api.js

10 ms

Accessibility Review

monogram.partners accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

monogram.partners best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

monogram.partners SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Monogram.partners can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Monogram.partners main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

monogram.partners

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Monogram. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: