12.3 sec in total
2.3 sec
9.7 sec
274 ms
Click here to check amazing Monogramm content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about monogramm.org
Logbuch für kreative Lebensführung
Visit monogramm.orgWe analyzed Monogramm.org page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
monogramm.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value4.4 s
73/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.086
93/100
15%
Value5.4 s
72/100
10%
2323 ms
448 ms
275 ms
273 ms
370 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Monogramm.org, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Monogramm.org.
Page size can be reduced by 806.6 kB (11%)
7.4 MB
6.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Monogramm.org main page is 7.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.2 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 266.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Monogramm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 271.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 271.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 195.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Monogramm.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 195.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (39%)
72
44
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Monogramm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
monogramm.org
2323 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
448 ms
frontend.css
275 ms
admin-font.css
273 ms
sc-style.css
370 ms
styles.css
310 ms
framework.css
712 ms
icons.css
720 ms
style.css
973 ms
css
30 ms
jetpack.css
1052 ms
podlove-web-player.css
1124 ms
jquery.js
1278 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1047 ms
frontend.js
965 ms
hashchange.min.js
1203 ms
podlove-web-player.js
1845 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1137 ms
scripts.js
1010 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
69 ms
wpgroho.js
974 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1231 ms
jquery.caroufredsel.js
1523 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1217 ms
jquery.assets.js
1520 ms
jquery.custom.js
1521 ms
e-201611.js
6 ms
load.js
85 ms
monogramm.org_logo_Ballpark_gro%C3%9F.png
272 ms
marathon-yousef1-296x197.jpg
476 ms
Running_Perf-296x197.jpg
477 ms
20430629918_523b896156_o-296x197.jpg
372 ms
16036577291_410637c7f8_o-296x197.jpg
469 ms
Zeit_Cafe-296x197.jpg
515 ms
16377139951_889a4465bb_o-296x197.jpg
583 ms
IMG_0045-296x197.jpg
824 ms
woman-296x197.png
1221 ms
deutschland-296x197.png
1219 ms
20440741434_e68072c88f_o-296x197.jpg
941 ms
glowwiththeflow-296x197.png
1304 ms
16373848162_71b7743535_k-296x197.jpg
1010 ms
20169214226_d771d4d4cb_k-296x197.jpg
1265 ms
malteyousef1-296x197.png
1715 ms
20077232705_e62fde2c36_o-296x197.jpg
1458 ms
Sunshine-296x197.png
2008 ms
Zeit_Cafe-1050x700.jpg
2092 ms
marathon-yousef1-1050x700.jpg
2493 ms
Running_Perf-750x700.jpg
2070 ms
20430629918_523b896156_o-1028x700.jpg
2260 ms
20169214226_d771d4d4cb_k-1050x700.jpg
2720 ms
20077232705_e62fde2c36_o-773x700.jpg
2788 ms
malteyousef1-1050x700.png
3817 ms
Sunshine-1050x700.png
3867 ms
queen-bicycle-race-1978-wembley-stadium-1050x700.jpg
3446 ms
IMG_0045.jpg
3623 ms
IMG_0001-960x700.jpg
3796 ms
Zeit_Cafe-600x600.jpg
3482 ms
marathon-yousef1-600x397.jpg
4225 ms
Running_Perf-600x600.jpg
4155 ms
20440741434_e68072c88f_o-600x600.jpg
4298 ms
20430629918_523b896156_o-600x600.jpg
4409 ms
loader.js
45 ms
20169214226_d771d4d4cb_k-600x400.jpg
4446 ms
20077232705_e62fde2c36_o-600x600.jpg
4514 ms
PyqsDANUgLi2UsdO-d4iZQ.woff
41 ms
l1cOQ90roY9yC7voEhngDD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
43 ms
dI-qzxlKVQA6TUC5RKSb3z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
43 ms
1bHRUMxmJHoup12DnI9XmQ.woff
42 ms
kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff
42 ms
I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff
43 ms
7DI7Kjvwfuz8m3ExKe6m-Q.woff
42 ms
icomoon.svg
4570 ms
KyYFnXlZbr1t4VSEzu9XzN8n88ipF2nHb6sbs6eAQVAOd0AeJxjYGbACwAAfQAE
37 ms
hovercard.css
60 ms
services.css
78 ms
malteyousef1-600x584.png
5401 ms
g.gif
20 ms
glowwiththeflow-600x598.png
5263 ms
Sunshine-600x598.png
5470 ms
queen-bicycle-race-1978-wembley-stadium-600x227.jpg
4711 ms
pixel.gif
4295 ms
monogramm.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
monogramm.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
monogramm.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Monogramm.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Monogramm.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
monogramm.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Monogramm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: