Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

monotypeimaging.com

Font & Technology Specialists | Monotype.

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

123 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

99 ms

monotypeimaging.com screenshot

About Website

Visit monotypeimaging.com now to see the best up-to-date Monotype Imaging content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about monotypeimaging.com

Explore Monotype fonts and the innovative technologies that bring words to page and screen. Discover our library of over 20,000 classic and new fonts.

Visit monotypeimaging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Monotypeimaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

monotypeimaging.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

monotypeimaging.com

123 ms

www.monotype.com

1457 ms

styles.css

10 ms

a46738bf-f9ef-4754-a3f9-06054ffbeddc.css

55 ms

71feb4d7-37ca-4e03-8506-747fb5c0a9f6.css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Monotypeimaging.com, 42% (11 requests) were made to Monotype.com and 15% (4 requests) were made to Match.adsrvr.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Monotype.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 677.3 kB (85%)

Content Size

793.5 kB

After Optimization

116.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Monotypeimaging.com main page is 793.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 494.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 57.8 kB

  • Original 65.8 kB
  • After minification 54.7 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 14.9 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Monotype Imaging needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 91% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 145.0 kB

  • Original 218.1 kB
  • After minification 187.1 kB
  • After compression 73.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 145.0 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 461.0 kB

  • Original 494.6 kB
  • After minification 492.2 kB
  • After compression 33.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Monotypeimaging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 461.0 kB or 93% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (47%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Monotype Imaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

monotypeimaging.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Monotypeimaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Monotypeimaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Monotype Imaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: