1.9 sec in total
57 ms
1.3 sec
491 ms
Visit moo.com now to see the best up-to-date MOO content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about moo.com
MOO makes great design and print for customers worldwide. Here you can find your country's MOO website and more about the MOO product offerings.
Visit moo.comWe analyzed Moo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
moo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
80/100
10%
Value3.2 s
71/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value6,920 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value24.6 s
0/100
10%
57 ms
187 ms
234 ms
117 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Moo.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Consent.trustarc.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (738 ms) belongs to the original domain Moo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 333.3 kB (32%)
1.0 MB
698.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Moo.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 624.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 330.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 91.0 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 330.7 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Moo.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (30%)
43
30
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of MOO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
57 ms
notice
187 ms
gtm.js
234 ms
api.js
117 ms
main.min.css
26 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
114 ms
main.min.js
104 ms
0674WF-April-May-Campaign-2024-HPC-640x570-PC-FLY3.jpg
105 ms
0674WF-April-May-Campaign-2024-HPC-640x570-MBS8.jpg
103 ms
0674WF-April-May-Campaign-2024-HPC-640x570-Branded-Merch2.jpg
105 ms
MOO-Icon-Sample-Pack.svg
100 ms
MOO-Icon-Next-Day-Delivery.svg
102 ms
MOO-Icon-Printfinity.svg
106 ms
MOO-Icon-Promise.svg
111 ms
0297WF-TR-752x564-business-cards.jpg
106 ms
0297WF-TR-752x564-postcards.jpg
109 ms
0297WF-TR-752x564-perpetual-planner0.jpg
111 ms
0297WF-TR-752x564-stickers.jpg
112 ms
0338WF-TR-752x564-notebooks.jpg
113 ms
0297WF-TR-752x564-notecards.jpg
113 ms
0677WF-Pink-WB-Discontinued-TR-752x564-Water-Bottles3.jpg
116 ms
0297WF-TR-752x564-flyers.jpg
113 ms
0674WF-April-May-Campaign-2024-BIWT-608x456-Sample-Pack2.jpg
113 ms
0674WF-April-May-Campaign-2024-L-376x282-12.jpg
115 ms
0674WF-April-May-Campaign-2024-L-376x282-21.jpg
116 ms
0513WF-May-Campaign-Site-UCG-640x640-51.jpg
113 ms
0513WF-May-Campaign-Site-UCG-640x640-10.jpg
116 ms
0513WF-May-Campaign-Site-UCG-640x640-40.jpg
116 ms
0513WF-May-Campaign-Site-UCG-640x640-60.jpg
117 ms
0585WF-CTA-1280x960-Intercom-Update.jpg
118 ms
AvenirNextRoundedPro-Reg.woff
393 ms
log
227 ms
v1.7-3281
228 ms
get
227 ms
recaptcha__en.js
227 ms
HozWekCcwZiN.js
206 ms
bat.js
157 ms
fs.js
270 ms
BryantMooWebProMedium.woff
738 ms
AvenirNextRoundedPro-Med.woff
143 ms
4000923.js
28 ms
4000923
70 ms
web
6 ms
clarity.js
6 ms
page
138 ms
landing
27 ms
landing
77 ms
integrations
162 ms
moo.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
moo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
moo.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Moo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
moo.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of MOO. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: