1.8 sec in total
11 ms
1.2 sec
617 ms
Click here to check amazing Moonbeam content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about moonbeam.network
Moonbeam is a smart contract platform for building cross-chain connected applications — enabling users to interact with multiple blockchains at the same time.
Visit moonbeam.networkWe analyzed Moonbeam.network page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
moonbeam.network performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
36/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value5.5 s
55/100
10%
Value1,870 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.195
63/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
11 ms
43 ms
109 ms
12 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Moonbeam.network, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (412 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 234.8 kB (19%)
1.3 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Moonbeam.network main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 608.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 111.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Moonbeam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 47.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.5 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Moonbeam.network needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.1 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (78%)
69
15
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Moonbeam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
moonbeam.network
11 ms
moonbeam.network
43 ms
gtm.js
109 ms
style.min.css
12 ms
frontend.css
23 ms
jAlert.min.css
34 ms
style.css
43 ms
frontend.min.css
38 ms
flatpickr.min.css
49 ms
select2.min.css
29 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
43 ms
grid-system.css
52 ms
style.css
66 ms
header-secondary-nav.css
56 ms
element-fancy-box.css
146 ms
element-scrolling-text.css
50 ms
element-highlighted-text.css
65 ms
element-cascading-images.css
56 ms
element-milestone.css
57 ms
element-recent-posts.css
57 ms
css
53 ms
responsive.css
60 ms
flickity.css
178 ms
select2.css
62 ms
ascend.css
87 ms
menu-dynamic.css
98 ms
js_composer.min.css
79 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
91 ms
style.css
90 ms
css
78 ms
jquery.min.js
99 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
140 ms
frontend.js
99 ms
jAlert.min.js
97 ms
sweetalert2.all.min.js
100 ms
flatpickr.min.js
100 ms
select2.min.js
100 ms
js
88 ms
v2.js
147 ms
salient-social.js
98 ms
frontend.min.js
100 ms
jquery.easing.js
99 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
98 ms
priority.js
132 ms
transit.js
129 ms
waypoints.js
121 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
117 ms
hoverintent.js
112 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
108 ms
intersection-observer.js
129 ms
flickity.min.js
102 ms
superfish.js
101 ms
init.js
102 ms
touchswipe.min.js
99 ms
select2.min.js
102 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
98 ms
analytics.js
266 ms
js
228 ms
Moonbeam-Logo-Final-500px.png
177 ms
ignite-hero-background-2-scaled.jpg
178 ms
Moonbeam_Hero.webp
176 ms
connected-contracts-moonbeam.png
178 ms
moonbeam-unlocks-interoperability-no-shadow.png
174 ms
user-100.png
175 ms
coins-100.png
178 ms
expansion-100.png
179 ms
background-texture-31.jpg
180 ms
Moonbeam-Foundation-Footer-300x98.png
179 ms
Moonbeam-Favicon-50.png
179 ms
Moonriver-Favicon-50px.png
181 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
166 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
218 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
279 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
280 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
280 ms
w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uK.ttf
412 ms
icomoon.woff
54 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
55 ms
collect
326 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
211 ms
moonbeam.network accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
moonbeam.network best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
moonbeam.network SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moonbeam.network can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Moonbeam.network main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
moonbeam.network
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Moonbeam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: