953 ms in total
115 ms
551 ms
287 ms
Welcome to motorreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Motor Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about motorreview.com
Visit motorreview.comWe analyzed Motorreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 838 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
motorreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
79/100
10%
Value7.3 s
4/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.9 s
43/100
10%
115 ms
10 ms
26 ms
22 ms
16 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Motorreview.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (118 ms) relates to the external source S.gravatar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 487.0 kB (38%)
1.3 MB
790.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Motorreview.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 526.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Motor Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 257.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 257.2 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 183.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Motorreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 183.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (65%)
55
19
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Motor Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
motorreview.com
115 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
10 ms
style.css
26 ms
css
22 ms
font-awesome.min.css
16 ms
jetpack.css
11 ms
jquery.js
35 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
9 ms
login-with-ajax.js
14 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
16 ms
init.js
18 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
113 ms
wpgroho.js
18 ms
jquery.fs.boxer.min.js
15 ms
cb-ext.js
110 ms
cb-scripts.min.js
15 ms
e-201611.js
11 ms
analytics.js
81 ms
motorreview.com.js
94 ms
p.js
80 ms
motorreview.com-async.js
81 ms
2016-Camaro-SS-3-360x240.jpg
79 ms
cobra-dash-cam-3-360x240.jpg
78 ms
2014-09-15-11.26.20-HDR-360x240.jpg
78 ms
Ford-Fiesta-Review-29-360x240.jpg
85 ms
2014-Ford-Explorer-Limited-Review-4-360x240.jpg
74 ms
renovo-coupe-side-360x240.jpg
48 ms
2014-Ford-Focus-ST-Review-23-360x240.jpg
77 ms
MotorReview_40755_1_1_HERO-360x240.jpg
86 ms
2014-Ford-F-150-Tremor-Review-Off-Road-4-360x240.jpg
84 ms
2015-Dodge-Challenger-SRT-Hellcat-0029-360x240.jpg
82 ms
MotorReview_7900_1_2_HERO-360x240.jpg
86 ms
MotorReview_MB-CLA45-AMG-0047_HERO-360x240.jpg
87 ms
MotorReview_213A4642_HERO-360x240.jpg
90 ms
MotorReview_Lincoln-MKZ-Comparison-0124_HERO-360x240.jpg
91 ms
MotorReview_BMW-M235i-0002_HERO-360x240.jpg
87 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
76 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
81 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
89 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
82 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
83 ms
hovercard.css
66 ms
services.css
118 ms
collect
105 ms
g.gif
47 ms
p-dTdeRsE4NP1z8.gif
47 ms
outbrain.js
117 ms
ga.js
41 ms
beacon.js
43 ms
walker-min.js
99 ms
gurgle.zdbb.net
113 ms
v60.js
99 ms
bk-coretag.js
97 ms
motorreview.com
61 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
set
92 ms
ptrack-v0.4.10.js
11 ms
20838
38 ms
6 ms
pixel
19 ms
pixel
18 ms
3 ms
chartbeat.js
16 ms
motorreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
motorreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
motorreview.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Motorreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Motorreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
motorreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Motor Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: