Tools & Wizards About Us
mountainmail.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

mountainmail.net

Mountain Mail - Your Office - Shipping, Notary, Secure Mail Boxes, Rubber Stamps, Printing,

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

308 ms

mountainmail.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mountain Mail content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mountainmail.net

Mountain Mail is your local printing and shipping company in Placerville, California offering a wide range of printing services, including business card printing, digital color printing, and self-serv...

Visit mountainmail.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Mountainmail.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mountainmail.net performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,140 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.192

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mountainmail.net

1697 ms

style.css

47 ms

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

73 ms

logo.png

102 ms

logo-png.png

140 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Mountainmail.net, 23% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Mountainmail.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 537.7 kB (14%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mountainmail.net main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 148.1 kB

  • Original 176.3 kB
  • After minification 173.4 kB
  • After compression 28.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 148.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 75.5 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mountain Mail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 309.3 kB

  • Original 637.4 kB
  • After minification 635.8 kB
  • After compression 328.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 309.3 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 20.1 kB
  • After minification 19.7 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mountainmail.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (37%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mountain Mail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mountainmail.net

mountainmail.net

1697 ms

style.css

style.css

47 ms

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

73 ms

logo.png

logo.png

102 ms

logo-png.png

logo-png.png

140 ms

PNGPIX-COM-FedEx-Logo-PNG-180x56.png

PNGPIX-COM-FedEx-Logo-PNG-180x56.png

121 ms

fedex-dhl-usps-ups-png.png

fedex-dhl-usps-ups-png.png

189 ms

copy-print.jpg

copy-print.jpg

189 ms

laying-in-peanuts.jpg

laying-in-peanuts.jpg

1065 ms

ebay-smaller.jpg

ebay-smaller.jpg

219 ms

mailbox.jpg

mailbox.jpg

804 ms

usps-logo-transparent.png

usps-logo-transparent.png

189 ms

fed-ex-trans-bw.png

fed-ex-trans-bw.png

224 ms

dhl-transparent.png

dhl-transparent.png

241 ms

ups-access-point6.png

ups-access-point6.png

236 ms

js

js

47 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

274 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

269 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

368 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

287 ms

es6-promise.auto.min.js

es6-promise.auto.min.js

312 ms

api.js

api.js

50 ms

recaptcha.js

recaptcha.js

311 ms

common.js

common.js

401 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

42 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

51 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

62 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

68 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

68 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

67 ms

font

font

68 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

67 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

75 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

76 ms

js

js

74 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

38 ms

collect

collect

33 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

211 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

65 ms

grey-gradient-2-1080.jpg

grey-gradient-2-1080.jpg

43 ms

star.png

star.png

86 ms

greay-gradient-4-1080.jpg

greay-gradient-4-1080.jpg

29 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

92 ms

Accessibility Review

mountainmail.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mountainmail.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mountainmail.net SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mountainmail.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mountainmail.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mountainmail.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mountain Mail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: